Solving Perplexing Commutator for Simplification

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
waht
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
4
When simplifying this

[tex]\int d^3x' [\pi(x), \frac{1}{2}\pi^2(x') + \frac{1}{2} \phi(x')( -\nabla^2 + m^2)\phi(x')][/tex]

we know that

[tex][\pi(x), \pi(x')] = 0[/tex]

[tex][\phi(x), \pi(x')] = -i\delta(x-x')[/tex]

how does that simplify to

[tex]\int d^3x' \delta(x-x')( -\nabla^2 + m^2)\phi(x')[/tex]

I know that

[tex][\pi(x), \pi^2(x')] = 0[/tex]

but not sure how does the laplacian gets factored out like that and one-half disappears?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By expanding the commutator we get,

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \int d^3x' \pi(x)\phi(x')( -\nabla^2 + m^2)\phi(x') - \phi(x')( -\nabla^2 + m^2)\phi(x')\pi(x)[/tex]

the laplacian in the second term is sandwiched between two phis, integration by part doesn't seem to help to factor it out.
 
I think you're better off using [tex][A,BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C][/tex] and then integration by parts. Also, it's a good time in your life to realize that a commutator behaves very much like a functional derivative (recall QM 101).