Solving Physics Time Problem: Apollo Lunar Landing Mission

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathcrzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the orbital period of the Apollo command module around the Moon at an altitude of 104 km. The relevant equation used is T^2 = [4π^2(r)]/g, where r is the radius and g is the gravitational acceleration. A participant attempts to solve for T but arrives at an implausible result of 1.7e13 minutes, raising questions about the input values. Specifically, there is confusion regarding the origin of the value 7.35e25, which is likely intended to represent the mass of the Moon. Clarifying the parameters and ensuring correct units are essential for solving the problem accurately.
mathcrzy
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

During an Apollo lunar landing mission, the command module continued to orbit the Moon at an altitude of about 104 km. How long did it take to go around the Moon once?

2. Homework Equations

T^2=[4pi^2(r)]/g

3. The Attempt at a Solution

square root of 4pi^2(7.35e25+104000)/9.8=1.7e13min. this answer does not make sense though
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does the 7.35e25 come from?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Help: Projectile Motion with Forces Problem -- Lunar Lander
Replies
8
Views
2K
Gravitational problem, spacecraft orbital period
Replies
1
Views
1K
Orbital Period of Apollo Mission
Replies
6
Views
5K
What is the impact speed of the lunar module?
Replies
8
Views
7K
I Simulation debugging for Apollo Lunar Landing
Replies
22
Views
2K
How Long Does It Take to Orbit the Moon at an Altitude of 100km?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Calculate the orbital period of a spacecraft around the moon
Replies
4
Views
24K
Margaret Hamilton, Lead Programmer, Apollo Program's Guidance Computer
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Does Special and General Relativity Affect Aging of Apollo Astronauts?
Replies
10
Views
3K
What Is the Minimum Velocity Factor for a Lunar Orbit?
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top