Solving Plane Pressure Problem: Finding the Line of Action

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of equation 15.16 related to pressure on a plane. The original poster is confused about how the line of action is determined, suggesting that the book may have omitted crucial steps in the explanation. Participants emphasize the importance of clarity in presenting equations and suggest that the centroid method is likely used for simplification. There is a request for a clearer image of the equation and additional context to facilitate understanding. Overall, the need for better communication of the derivation process is highlighted.
Phys5
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to study for an exam and a section in the book on pressure on a plane is shown in the attached picture. I am trying to understand how equation15.16 was derived. I know normally the line of action is found using moments so this seems to be a short cut but I can'tunderstand how the book got to this equation. Any help would be muchappreciated. Thanks![/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_0181.JPG
    IMG_0181.JPG
    39.8 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation 15.16 is illegible. Please post it with a better picture. Also post the relevant equations and your bet attempt at solving or understanding what is going on.
 
I don't believe the issue is that they took some clever shortcut as it is that they plain just didn't say anything about how they got there. I am sure they just found the centroid as the that is pretty easy and I can't imagine there being anything shorter.

Write the pressure as a function of depth h and integrate

∫ h P(h) / ∫ P(h)

from h1 to h2.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
∫ h P(h) / ∫ P(h)
This is not an equation. An equation has two sides. Which side is this, what is the other side and what is the equation supoosed to represent?
 
Cutter Ketch said:
I am sure they just found the centroid
Or even just looked it up... Centroid of a trapezoid.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top