Solving Quadratic Equations: (-2,5), (2.5,18.5) Answers Explained

bob4000
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
hey there reader

i have:
y=3x+11
y=2xsquared+2x+5

i have to solve these as they are represent a straight line and a curve respectively. so far i have:

3x+11=2xsquared+2x+5 at the intersection

;2xsquared-x-6=0

i factorised this and checked it to make sure it matched the above equation:

(2x+4)(x-2.5)

when i multiplied it out to check it i got: 2xsquared-x-6=0, which is alrite

when going on to solve x and y, i end up with:

x=-2
x=2.5
putting these into y=3x+11 i got:

y=5
y=18.5

finally giving the intersections of (-2,5) and (2.5,18.5)

however the answers given by the textbook from which the question was taken from, the intersections are (-1.5,6.5) and (2,17)

im really confused and would be much obliged for any help given

thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is 4*2.5=6?
 
its 4*-2.5=-6
 
Remarkable. My calculator says that 4* -2.5= -10.

4*(2- .5)= 6
 
4*(-2.5)=-10
 
omg! i feel so goddamn stupid! :blushing:

thnx guys. i don't think i should be doing as level maths if i can't do 4*-2.5!

thnx again.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top