Solving Question Using Atomic Weights | Tips & Hints

  • Thread starter Thread starter questions_uk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the question using atomic weights, users are advised to substitute the atomic weights into the provided structures to determine the values of n and m. There is a mention of an issue with the visibility of the shared file, which may require scaling for better readability. Participants are encouraged to share hints or tips to assist in the problem-solving process. The discussion emphasizes collaboration and the importance of clear visuals for effective problem-solving. Overall, the focus remains on finding solutions through the application of atomic weights.
questions_uk
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
hi if anyone could give some hints or tips with this it would be greatly appreciated. the ss is here: http://www.freewebs.com/questionsuk/question.jpg

just substitute the atomic weights into the structures and work out values of n and m?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
questions_uk said:
hi if anyone could give some hints or tips with this it would be greatly appreciated. the ss is here: http://www.freewebs.com/questionsuk/question.jpg

just substitute the atomic weights into the structures and work out values of n and m?

thanks

Welcome to PF. The file is not visible , it is not page sized.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IE automatically rescales it, GCT. Scale it up and you'll be able to read it fine.
 
Hi. any input is appreciated!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top