Solving Relative Speed and Flashes in S' Frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving relative speed and light flashes in different reference frames. The initial setup includes a red light flash at xR = 3.00m and tR = 1e-9s, and a blue light flash at xB = 5.00m and tB = 9e-9s, with both flashes occurring at the same location in frame S'. Participants suggest using Lorentz transformations to find the relative speed between frames S and S', as well as the locations and timings of the flashes in S'. There is confusion regarding the application of equations and the handling of fractional uncertainties in a separate but related question about error propagation. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying relativistic concepts and the challenges in understanding the mathematics involved.
Oerg
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A red light flashes at position xR = 3:00m and time tR = 1e-9s, and
a blue light flashes at xB = 5:00m and tB = 9e-9 s, all measured in
the S reference frame. Reference frame S` has its origin at the same point
as S at t = t0 = 0; frame S' moves uniformly to the right. Both flashes
are observed to occur at the same place in S'. (a) Find the relative speed
between S and S`. (b) Find the location of the two flashes in frame S`.
(c) At what time does the red flash occur in the S' frame?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am going crazy! This is my approach.

taking the distance of S' from x_R to be L_p measured in S and distance of S' from x_B to be contracted length L_C as measured in S',

L_p=L_c \times \gamma
x_A+2=x_A \times \gamma

at t_B distance traveled by S' frame is v X t'
taking t' to be t_B \times gamma,
x_A=3-vt'

But when i substituted x_A back into the equation, i became stuck! so obviously something is wrong but i cannot figure out what is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite understand what you are doing. In any case, for a problem like this, why not use the Lorentz transformations directly. That's what they are for!
 
Doc AI, thanks for helping me again. I have another question though that is slightly unrelated to this.

Given that f=\frac{\bar u \bar v}{\bar u +\bar v}

show that

e_f=f^2({\frac{e_u}{\bar u^2} + \frac{e_v}{\bar v^2})

where e refers to the error. ok so I added up the fractional uncertainties and I got this

\frac{e_f}{f}=\frac{e_u}{u}+\frac{e_v}{v}+\frac{e_u+e_v}{u+v}

after some simplifying, I got to this,

e_f=f^2(\frac{e_u(u+v)}{u^2v}+\frac{e_v(u+v)}{v^2u}+\frac{e_u+e_v}{uv})

and then I realized that I could never get the answer, however, if this term was negative,
\frac{e_u+e_v}{uv}, i would get the answer perfectly, but how can it be negative? Problem is even in division, shouldn't the fractional uncertianties add up??
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top