Solving Rotational Problem: Satellite Elliptical Orbit, Torque & Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anthonyphy2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a satellite in an elliptical orbit influenced solely by gravitational attraction from a planet. It addresses whether torque is acting on the satellite, concluding that there is none since the force is parallel to the pivot. The conversation explores calculating the satellite's speed at different points using the formula f=mv^2/r, while assuming constant gravitational force. Participants also touch on the conservation of angular momentum, noting that the satellite maintains the same angular momentum throughout its orbit. The insights emphasize the relationship between speed and radius in orbital mechanics.
Anthonyphy2013
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A satellite follows an elliptical orbit. The only force on the satellite is the gravity atraction from the planet. The satellites speed at point A is 8000m/s, and it is 6000km away, Point B is 24000km east of the planet, and Point C is component vector 9000ikm+12000jkm away, if the you take the planet as the origin.

a. Is there any torque acting on the satellite?
b. satellite speed at Point B
c, satellite speed at Point C

Homework Equations



torque = force*R

The Attempt at a Solution


part a, I consider there is no torque since the only force is parallel to the pivot . Does it make sense.
part b ,since my professor does not mention gravitational force on this question , I use the f=mv^2/r to this question. i know there is no torque , and I know the radius is changing and I assume the gravitational force for at point a , b and c are the same and then I apply f=mva^2/ra = mvb^2/r2 . is that a good way to solve this problem ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you guys covered conservation of angular momentum?
 
yes , but how could angular momentum , L=mvr could apply to this question ?
 
Well the mass of the satellite does not change. And it has the same angular momentum at every place in its orbit with respect to the planet...
 
V*r = V'*r'

Familiar?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top