Solving Solubility of Unknown Compound in Base

  • Thread starter Thread starter HyeLim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Solubility
AI Thread Summary
The solubility test of an unknown compound in 5% NaOH suggests that if the compound is insoluble, the supernatant should be treated with 5% HCl until neutral. The resulting precipitate or turbidity indicates that the unknown compound is likely an organic acid. The reaction involves the formation of a soluble conjugate base (A-) in the basic solution, which reverts to the insoluble acid (HA) upon acidification. This process explains the observed turbidity or precipitation. Understanding these reactions is crucial for accurately identifying the unknown compound.
HyeLim
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In my lab, I'm trying to identify an unknown compound. So I did a solubility test of the unknown into 5% NaOH. According to the manual it said that if it appears insoluble,take the supernatant out and add 5% HCl until neutral. If percipitate or turbidity results, it means the unknown is an acid.
So far I thought this:
HA (unknown) + OH- <-> H20 + A-
I'm assuming the conjugate base was in the supernatant, but I'm not sure.
A- + HCl <-> Cl- + HA
I'm not sure where the percipitate or turbidity is from. Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first part, the organic acid present dissolved (why you obtained the very soluble A anion). Later, you added H+ which recombined with the A- giving you back the fairly insoluble organic acid again, the HA. The HA causes this turbidity or precipitation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top