Solving Spontaneous Reactions Homework: ΔG -270 kJ

AI Thread Summary
At 2600 K, the vaporization of boron carbide is analyzed with ΔG° = 775 kJ. The reaction quotient Q was calculated as 1 x 10^-21, but the user struggled with the absence of volume information for the reaction vessel. The calculation of ΔG using the equation ΔG = -RT*ln(Q) resulted in 1044 kJ, which contradicts the book's answer of -270 kJ. It was clarified that the activity of solids is assumed to be 1 and thus not included in the reaction quotient. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately determining the spontaneity of the reaction.
τheory
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At 2600 K, ΔG° = 775 kJ for the vaporization of boron carbide:
B_{4}C (s) ⇔ 4 B (g) + C (s)

Find ΔG and determine if the process is spontaneous if the reaction vessel contains 4.00 mol of B_{4}C (s), 0.400 mol of C (s), and B (g) at a partial pressure of 1.0 x 10^-5 atm. At this temperature, R T = 21.6 kJ

2. The attempt at a solution

I first tried to find the reaction quotient but quickly realized that they did not give me the volume for this vessel. Thus, I just plugged everything into the reaction quotient (products/reactants) and got Q = 1*10^-21.

Then I plugged that into the ΔG = -RT*ln(Q) equation:

ΔG = -RT*ln(Q)
ΔG = -(21.6 J * 1000)*ln(1*10^-21)
ΔG = 1.044*10^6 J = 1044 kJ

The answer on the back of the book says that ΔG is in fact -270 kJ; how is this the answer? What mistake did I do in my calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please write the reaction quotient.
 
Q=\frac{(pB)^4*[C]}{[B_{4}C]}
 
What do you know about solids in this context?
 
Um all I can figure out is that the solids are within a closed vessel and that the temperature also appears to be 2600 K since 21.6kJ/8.314 = 2600. The only issue regarding the solid is that I don't know what the volume is, which is prohibiting me from finding the concentration mol/L.

The only other thing is that maybe I have the wrong idea of how concentration of a solid works?
 
Activity of solids is assumed to be 1, so they are not present in the reaction quotient.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top