Solving stochastic differentials for time series forecasting

jjhyun90
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am trying to reproduce results of a paper. The model is:

<br /> dS = (v-y-\lambda_1)Sdt + \sigma_1Sdz_1 \\<br /> dy = (-\kappa y - \lambda_2)dt + \sigma_2 dz_2 \\<br /> dv = a((\bar{v}-v)-\lambda_3)dt + \sigma_3 dz_3 \\<br /> dz_1dz_2 = \rho_{12}dt \\<br /> dz_1dz_3 = \rho_{13}dt \\<br /> dz_2dz_3 = \rho_{23}dt \\<br />
where S, y, and v are state variables and z_1, z_2, z_3 are Wiener processes.

The parameters \kappa, a, \bar{v}, \lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3, \sigma_1, \sigma_2, \sigma_3, \rho_{12}, \rho_{13}, \rho_{23} are given. There is time series data such for each day I can estimate S, y, and v.

The goal is to estimate the next day's S, y, and v. It feels like an easy task, but am not familiar with differential equations or Wiener processes (let alone stochastic calculus). Without understanding the model, I was naively trying to "substitute" dt with Δt, etc, but the given parameters are such that \rho_{12} &gt; 0, \, \rho_{23} &gt; 0, \, \rho_{13} &lt; 0, so I realized I should not do that.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to solve the equations numerically? I think people typically interpret the dt as a small timestep Δt. I guess the tricky part is the stochastic terms - it looks like they should be Gaussian distributed random variables with covariances \rho_{12}, etc? Generating those might be tricky? Otherwise everything else looks straightforward.

The equations are simple enough to solve analytically, but if you're not familiar with differential equations that might not be the best avenue for you. But, if you want to try, you can solve the y and v equations using integrating factors, and then plug the solutions into the S equation, which you can solve by dividing out the S and writing dS/S = d(\ln S), then it's a simple matter of integration. (I would write dz_1/dt = \eta_1(t), etc.)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top