Solving Stochastic Processes: A/B in (0,T)

  • Thread starter Thread starter wildman
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving independent random variables A and B, both normally distributed, to find the probability p that the process X(t) = A - Bt crosses the t-axis in the interval (0,T). The hint provided indicates that p can be expressed as the probability that the ratio A/B falls between 0 and T. The solution involves recognizing the regions in the BA plane where A and B must have the same sign, leading to a geometric interpretation of the problem. The final result shows that p can be derived from the angle θ in the BA plane, yielding the formula πp = arctan(T). This approach simplifies the problem significantly by leveraging the symmetry of the joint probability density function.
wildman
Messages
29
Reaction score
4
Could someone give me a hint for this problem? I have no idea how to attack it.

The random variables A and B are independent N(0;\sigma) and p is the probability that the process X(t) = A - Bt crosses the t axis in the interval (0,T). Show that \pi p = arctan T. Hint: p = P{0 <= A/B <= T}.

Well I know that independent means:

f(x,y) = f_x(x) f_y(y)

Normal is equal to:

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi {\sigma}^2}} e^{\frac{-x^2}{2 {\sigma}^2}}

The hint says that the answer is the probability that A/B is between 0 and T.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why not start by writing the probability distribution for x(t) or trying to show the hit the question gave you.
 
Ok. Here is the answer. It was actually pretty much on page 187 of the textbook (Papoulis and Pillai, 4th edition):

The example is to show the ratio Z = X/Y has a Cauchy density centered at
\frac {r\sigma_1}{\sigma_2} and X and Y are random variables with zero mean and a normal density.
After doing some math (which I am too lazy to copy), the book ends up with this formula (6-63) (of which I simplified since the random variables are independent and the variances are the same:)

F_z(z) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{\pi}arctan Z where Z = A/B

From the hint we know that the probabilities are between 0 and T so

p = P[0&lt;z&lt;T] = F_z(T) - F_z(0)

so
p = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{\pi}arctan T - (\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{\pi}arctan (0))

and from that the answer is obvious.
 
Hi wildman. I don't have the text you reference so I don't know what the "math which you're too lazy to copy" is, but there is a way to do this that doesn't require very difficult maths.

The best way to approach this type of problem is to identify the region (R) in the "BA" plane where A-Bt will have a zero-crossing. Once you've identified this region then the probability you seek is nothing more than the integral over the region R of the joint pdf. This integral can be difficult in some cases but fortunately in this case it's pretty trivial.

Since you want A-tB to have a zero-crossing for t in [0..T] then it follows that A and B must be of the same sign (since T and hence t is non-negative). This means that the regions can only be in quadrants I and III.

It doesn't take much to find that the region we require in quadrant-I is A<BT. This is the area between the straight line A=BT and the B axis. Since A=BT is a straight line with gradient T then from basic geometry this region is a sector in the "BA plane" of angle \theta = \tan^{-1}(T). Obviously there is a similar region in quadrant-III where |A|<|B|T and again this second region is a sector of angle \,\tan^{-1}(T).

So the probablity we require is the integral of the joint pdf over the union of these regions. Since the joint pdf has radial symmetry and it's total integral over 0..2Pi is unity, then the integral over each sector of angle theta is simply \theta / 2 \pi and the total integral over both (quadrant I and III) sectors is \theta / \pi.

That is,

p = \frac{\theta}{\pi} = \frac{\tan^{-1}(T)}{\pi}
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top