Solving Summations with Modified Exponents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buddy711
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
Buddy711
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.
I hardly remember the fomulas of summation of sequence.

I got this problem.

{\frac{1}{8}}\sum^{\infty}_{n=2}n({\frac{3}{4}})^{n-2}

The result is 2.5.
How can I solve this problem?

Thanks all. :)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Assuming |r| < 1 then

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} r^n = \frac{1}{1-r}

Differentiation both sides with respect to r gives:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n \cdot r^{n-1} = \frac{1}{(1-r)^2}

This should give you a push in the right direction.

(Warning: Be careful of your initial index.)

--Elucidus
 
You suggested me very good approach.
However, the problem still remains,,,

my equation is n vs (n-2), not n vs (n-1)

Thanks!
 
Raising it to the power of n-2 instead of n-1 is just dividing it by 3/4. You should be able to find a way to modify your series so that you have an n-1 in the exponent
 
Office_Shredder said:
Raising it to the power of n-2 instead of n-1 is just dividing it by 3/4. You should be able to find a way to modify your series so that you have an n-1 in the exponent

You are absolutely right.
I was so stupid.

Thank you ;-)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top