Solving Surface Tension w/Eötvös Rule: Obtaining Abnormal Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter wishgames
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on using Eötvös rule to calculate the surface tension of water, with initial results significantly deviating from the expected value of 75.7 mN/m. The user initially calculated a surface tension of 0.0114 mN/m at 0 Celsius, leading to confusion about temperature units. Participants emphasize the importance of consistency in temperature units, noting that both Celsius and Kelvin can be used as long as they are applied uniformly. After correcting a calculation error related to molar volume, a revised result of 114 mN/m was obtained, though it still fell short of the expected value. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in scientific calculations and the need for careful unit management.
wishgames
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am attempting to use Eötvös rule
b492df588ae8d37ba6020019ac203ca7.png
to find the surface tension of water but am not obtaining normal results.

Surface Tension= 2.7*10^(-7)(374-x)*18^(-2/3)
at T=0 Celsius Surface tension = .0114 mN/m with this equation far from the normal 75.7 mN/m
what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Scientists normally measure temperature in degrees Kelvin not degrees Celsius
 
Last edited:
Studiot said:
Scientists normally measure temperature in degrees Kelvin not degrees Celcius

. . . . . because the Zero, used in all other scales is quite arbitrary. It can be based on the fixed freezing point of water, alcohol or anything else. 0K, otoh, is Absolute.
Everybody, I'm sure, has made the mistake at least once in their lives of using °C when they should have used K and arrived at a crazy answer. :wink: You are in good company.
 
Since it's Tc-T, it will work in either Celsius or Kelvin. However, you have to make sure that either both are Celsius or both are Kelvin. You can't mix and match.
 
I think the error is in deriving V from molar mass and density. You should get 18.10-6 m3/mol. The 10-6 seems to have been lost.
 
I'm doing the calculations in Celsius since the critical temperature is in Celsius. Thank you haruspex. Measuring the V in m3/mol made the result 114 mN/m which is closer to the actual surface tension but still off.
 
wishgames said:
I'm doing the calculations in Celsius since the critical temperature is in Celsius. Thank you haruspex. Measuring the V in m3/mol made the result 114 mN/m which is closer to the actual surface tension but still off.
Yes, I also get 114 (after correcting the typo in the OP; you had 2.7 instead of 2.1). In the wikipedia entry it mentions subtracting another 6 degrees, but that doesn't help much. Curiously, that leaves the value almost exactly 3/2 times too high.
 
Back
Top