Solving System of 2n Equations

defunc
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I have a system of 2n equations. n of these unknowns can be expressed explicitly in terms of the remaining n. The resulting n x n matrix is more dense than the original 2n x 2n and the original 2n x 2n system has some desired properties like diagonal dominance etc. So, should I leave the 2n equations intact or perform the back substitutions and solve the more complex n equations?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you are concerned with computational efficiency and/or accuracy. I think it depends on (1) how big n is and (2) what the condition number is of the matrix in each case. The 2n case will require roughly 8 times the computational resources versus the n case, but if the condition number is more favorable, it might be worth it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top