Solving Tensor Integration on a Unit Sphere: Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter tim85ruhruniv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Tensor
tim85ruhruniv
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Could someone help me out ??

I tried this integration over the surface of a sphere of unit radii,

\[<br /> P_{mn}e_{m}\otimes e_{n}=\frac{1}{D_{pq}e_{p}\otimes e_{q}}\int e_{m}\otimes e_{n}dS_{r=1}\]

and I always get \[<br /> 4\pi e_{m}\otimes e_{n}\] and the 'D' tensor as it is..

I am expecting additionally a '3' in the denominator, am I wrong ? If i do the integration over unit volume then I get the 3 in the denominator. Sorry for sounding stupid but is there a necessity to consider the unit tensor, i just assume it as a constant under integration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Homework assignments and stuff like that should be posted in the appropriate section.

I don't get your indices either; it seems they don't add up on left and right hand sides. e_m \otimes e_n definitely needs not be constant. Consider for example usual spherical coordinates.
 
tim85ruhruniv said:
\[<br /> P_{mn}e_{m}\otimes e_{n}=\frac{1}{D_{pq}e_{p}\otimes e_{q}}\int e_{m}\otimes e_{n}dS_{r=1}\]

Okay, I'll bite; along with clamtrox's note about indices, I have questions. What does

\frac{1}{D_{pq}e_{p}\otimes e_{q}}

mean? How does one divide by a tensor (not the component of a tensor), which is an element of a vector space?
clamtrox said:
Homework assignments and stuff like that should be posted in the appropriate section.

Yes and no. From the Physics Forums rules:
Since graduate level assignments are meant to be more thought provoking (and hence more worthy of discussion), graduate level questions will be allowed in the relevant part of the main section of PF, provided that the graduate student attempts the problem and shows his work.
 
hey !

Thanks guys for looking at my work.


I can't see how the indices don't add up... maybe i am missing something... but

Each component of
\[<br /> \mathbf{P}\]will be a function of the \mathbf{\mathrm{D}^{-1}} tensor.


about division by the tensor..

x=\mathbf{D}y for some 'x' and some 'y'

so I hope I can rewrite this as y=\mathbf{\mathrm{D}^{-1}}x
and probably find the Inverse at a later stage. Which for the time being I believe doesent depend on the co-ordinates of integration.

Like clamtrox said, I use spherical co-ordinates to integrate, should I worry about \[<br /> e_{m}\otimes e_{n}\] should I transform the tensor basis ?
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top