Solving the Bessel Equation: Find Solutions & Justify

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi there. I'm working with the Bessel equation, and I have this problem. It says:
a) Given the equation
\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}+\frac{1}{t}\frac{dy}{dt}+4t^2y(t)=0
Use the substitution x=t^2 to find the general solution

b) Find the particular solution that verifies y(0)=5
c) Does any solution accomplish y'(0)=2? Justify.

Well, so what I did is:
x=t^2 \rightarrow t=\sqrt{x}
\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{dy}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dy}{dx}2t
\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}4t^2+2\frac{dy}{dx}=4x\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}+2\frac{dy}{dx}

Then \frac{d^2y}{dt^2}+\frac{1}{t}\frac{dy}{dt}+4t^2y(t)=\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}+\frac{1}{x}\frac{dy}{dx}+y(x)=0

Now I'm not pretty sure what I should do to solve this. I thought of using Frobenius, would that be right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you solved the Bessel equation

x2y'' + xy' +(x2-n2)y =0

in class, with its solutions Jn(x) and Yn(x)? If you multilply your equation by x2 it looks like that with n = 0.

If so, that would save you some work. Otherwise, yes, multiply it by x2 and do a series solution.
 
Yes, you're right. Thanks.
 
I have that one solution would be J_{\nu},\nu=0 but I'm not to sure about the other linear independent solution, cause if I use Y_{\nu}=\frac{\cos \nu\pi J_{\nu}-J_{-\nu}}{\sin \nu\pi} I got that Y_{0}=\frac{\cos 0\pi J_0-J_{-0}}{\sin 0\pi} which is not defined, right?

I'm sorry, is the first time I'm working with this, probably I'm committing a really stupid mistake.

It still no clear how is that Y_0 is well defined, but anyway, I've accepted that it is, and tried to go on. But now the problem asks me to evaluate my solution, which is: y(x)=C_1J_0+C_2Y_0 in zero, which is: y(0)=C_1J_0(0)+C_2Y_0(0) to verify the condition, and the thing is that the function Y_{\nu} goes to -infinity in x=0, right? how should I proceed?
 
Last edited:
Telemachus said:
But now the problem asks me to evaluate my solution, which is: y(x)=C_1J_0+C_2Y_0 in zero, which is: y(0)=C_1J_0(0)+C_2Y_0(0) to verify the condition, and the thing is that the function Y_{\nu} goes to -infinity in x=0, right? how should I proceed?

Your boundary condition that y(0) be finite tells you that C2 must be zero because, as you have noted, Y0(x) blows up at x = 0.

Don't forget that x = t2 when you back substitute. I think if you look at the series for J0 you will see how to pick C1 to satisfy the first boundary condition. Then use the series to answer the second question.
 
Thanks :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top