Solving the Chain Rule: A Visual Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the chain rule in calculus to differentiate a complex function involving nested expressions and trigonometric components. The original poster presents a derivative problem and seeks clarification on simplification and correctness of their approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate a function using the product and chain rule, expressing concern about the complexity of the result and whether further simplification is necessary. Some participants suggest substituting parts of the function to simplify the differentiation process. Others engage in discussing potential errors in the original poster's notation and explore alternative representations of trigonometric identities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and suggestions for alternative methods of differentiation. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's approach, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the challenges of differentiating lengthy functions and considering the implications of using trigonometric identities. There is a playful exchange regarding terminology and the complexity of the expressions involved.

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(x+(x+sin^2(x))^3)^4[/tex]

Homework Equations


Calc up to Chain Rule.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using product and chain rule I got:
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=4(x+(x+sin^2(x))^3)^3(1+3(x+sin^2(x))^2)(1+\frac{d}{dx}sin^2(x))[/tex]

Then I calculated the derivative of sin^2(x):
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}sin^2(x)=2sin(x)cos(x)[/tex]

and put that into the derivative to get:

[tex]y'=4(x+(x+sin^2(x))^3)^3(1+3(x+sin^2(x))^2)(1+2sin(x)cos(x))[/tex]

Do I further simplify this? It does not seem obvious to me. What should I be paying attention to next?
Here is another problem I worked out. I think it's correct, assuming I am using the chain-rule correctly?
[PLAIN]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/2691/imag0025ed.jpg
It simplified down to something sort of pretty, but that other one looks horrible!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is correct. I think you can't simplify it further. But at entry level, if you're afraid of using chain rule for really lengthy functions, like this, you can substitute a suitable part of it. ie.

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(x+(x+sin^2(x))^3)^4[/tex]
let,
[tex](x+sin^2(x)) = z[/tex]
so,
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(x+(x+sin^2(x))^3)^4 = \frac{d}{dx}(x+z^3)^4[/tex]

Now, do differentiate in the same way. The final answer will be same, but it may decrease the chance to make a mistake.
 
Last edited:
That is basically what I was doing. Only I did it in my head.
 
QuarkCharmer said:
That is basically what I was doing. Only I did it in my head.

Hi QuarkCharmer! :wink:

I think you have a bracket in the wrong place, but otherwise it's fine. :smile:

In your second one, if you're wondering why it's so neat, that's because you could rewrite the bottom as (√2)cos(πx - π/4) …

then the top becomes cossin - sincos = sin((πx - π/4) - πx) = sin(-π/4) = -1/√2. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi QuarkCharmer! :wink:

I think you have a bracket in the wrong place, but otherwise it's fine. :smile:

In your second one, if you're wondering why it's so neat, that's because you could rewrite the bottom as (√2)cos(πx - π/4) …

then the top becomes cossin - sincos = sin((πx - π/4) - πx) = sin(-π/4) = -1/√2. :wink:

I see what you did there, but unless it's really obvious, those phase shifting identities would be going a bit too far I would think?
 
Hi QuarkCharmer! :smile:
QuarkCharmer said:
… phase shifting identities …

You make it sound like something out of Star Trek! :biggrin:

Surely it's always simpler to deal with one cos rather than a sum of two?

(You might like to try differentiating a general cos(x+A)/cosx, = cosA + sinAtanx :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi QuarkCharmer! :smile:


You make it sound like something out of Star Trek! :biggrin:

Surely it's always simpler to deal with one cos rather than a sum of two?

(You might like to try differentiating a general cos(x+A)/cosx, = cosA + sinAtanx :wink:)

Hey, I didn't make up the nomenclature! I learned about alternating current before I knew what trigonometry was, so I just think of it that way.

I'll give that a shot, but do you mean to prove the equality, or differentiate one of the sides?
 
I hope the identity is obvious! :smile:

I meant differentiate one of the sides. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K