Solving the Differential Equation Using Laplace Transform

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddiej90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the ordinary differential equation d2y/dt2 + 4.2dy/dt + 4.5y = 0 using the Laplace transform method, with initial conditions y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = 1. The user successfully applied Laplace transforms but struggled with rearranging the resulting equation to match standard forms in Laplace tables. They attempted completing the square for the denominator but were unsure how to proceed with the parameters α and β in the context of partial fraction decomposition. Another participant clarified that completing the square is indeed possible and suggested that partial fraction decomposition is unnecessary in this case. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing quadratic forms in Laplace transforms for effective problem-solving.
eddiej90
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the laplace transform technique, solve the ordinary differential equation:
d2y/dt2+4.2dy/dt+4.5y=0 initial conditions: y(0)=1 and y'(0)=1


Homework Equations


From laplace tables:
d2y/dt2=s2Y-sy(0)-y'(0)
dy/dt=sY-y(0)


3. The Attempt at a Solution
After using the laplace tables to convert the equation, and rearranging it to make Y the subject, I have come to this point:
Y=(s+5.2)/s2+4.2s+4.5
Iv tried completing the square on the denominator and other methods but cannot get to a point that looks similar to the laplace tables in order to convert it back. I am pretty sure i need to use the ones under the section "General approach to quadratic functions of the form as2 + bs + c" however i have completely no idea as to what to do with α and β
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thamkyou for the link, however you cannot factorise the denominator, unless you complete the square. Can you use the partial fraction method with completing the square?
 
eddiej90 said:
Thamkyou for the link, however you cannot factorise the denominator, unless you complete the square. Can you use the partial fraction method with completing the square?

Your denominator can certainly complete the square, s^2+4.2s+4.5=(s+2.1)^2-2.1^2+4.5, doesn't it? Obviously no need for partial fraction decomposition :biggrin:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K