Solving the Drosophila Disaster: Investigating Surprising Genetics Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Munki
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around unexpected results from a genetics experiment involving crosses between Apterous (wingless) and Dumpy (misshapen wings) flies, which produced offspring with Wild (normal) wings. This outcome raises questions about dominant and recessive alleles, as the expectation was for one phenotype to dominate. The possibility of experimental compromise was considered, but repeated results suggest otherwise. The conversation explores the idea that the Apterous and Dumpy traits may stem from defects in different genetic pathways. By crossing these flies, the offspring could inherit functional copies of the genes, resulting in the Wild phenotype. The need for further experimentation, particularly with an F2 generation, is highlighted to clarify the inheritance patterns and expected phenotypic ratios.
Munki
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been conducting some genetics experiments for my Bio/Genetics class and in the most recent one I got some suprising results.

I did a cross between Apterous (wingless) flies, and Dumpy (misshappen wings) files. The offspring of the experiment had Wild (normal) wings. I can't explain this occurance. I would think that one allele would be dominant over the other, but instead, I get an entirely different trait.

Can anyone help me explain these results, or at least point me in the right direction? I've already thought of the experiments being compromised, but I've done it several times, and I keep getting the same results. I have yet to do an F2 generation.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Perhaps only the flies that are homozygotic for Apterous or Dumpy get the trait. So you crossed AA flies with DD flies which would give you F1 flies that were all heterozygotic AD.

In the F2 generation you will get Apterous and Dumpy flies as well as normal flies. I guess you know what percentage of each to expect if this the case.
 
Maybe you complemented the genes? Meaning that the apterous and dumpy phenotypes are due to gene defects in different pathways, so by crossing them they regain a functional copy of the gene and loose their phenotype.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top