Solving the Inelastic Collision of 3 Balls

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an inelastic collision problem involving three balls with given masses and initial velocities. The user sets up momentum equations in both x and y directions but initially struggles with the correct sign conventions for the velocities. After recalculating and correcting the signs, they find the correct initial velocity for Ball 2 to be 13.11 m/s. The user acknowledges a mistake in their setup regarding the direction of the velocities, which led to confusion. Ultimately, they successfully arrive at the correct answer after addressing the sign issues.
kk727
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2ur1lwy.png


Ball 1: 3kg, 7 m/s initially
Ball 2: 4kg, V m/s initially
Ball 3: 5kg, 10 m/s initially

Find V if the system collides inelastically and moves off at 2 m/s at 5 degrees above the horizontal.

Homework Equations



p + p = p + p (in both x and y directions)

The Attempt at a Solution



I set up the equations for momentum in both directions (sin and cosine). I ended up with 4v*sinθ = 13.7558 and 4v*cosθ = 50.608. I then solved for θ and got 15.2 degrees and an initial velocity for Ball 2 of 13.11 m/s. I don't believe this is the answer my teacher had in class.

My only question is, when setting up the problem, would you consider the velocity of Ball 3 to be negative? That's how I calculated it. I have no problems with the calculations, just the setting up of the problem. I didn't write all of my work down, but it was something like this:

(sin 15)(7)(3) + (sin θ)(v)(4) + (5)(-10)(sin 20) = (2)(sin5)(12)

And I simplified it, did the same for cosines, solved for θ, and then plugged into solve for V.

Am I way off?

:/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(sin 15)(7)(3) should be negative, too - the vertical component is down.
 
Thank you! I realized I had my signs all wrong...stupid mistake! I figured it out and got the right answer!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top