Solving the Kc of a Chemical Reaction with N2O4

Thread starter mooneh
Start date Apr 20, 2008
Tags

Chemical Chemical reaction Reaction

Apr 20, 2008

mooneh

heey i have this chem homework quest :

5 L flask is filled with 0.625 mol of (N2O4) if you know that concentration of (N2O4) at equilibrium = 0.075 M
what is the kc for the rxn ??
2 NO2 → N2O4
←

Physics news on Phys.org

Scientist returns to microbial roots and discovers potential quantum computing advancement
Physicists achieve record precision in measuring proton-to-electron mass ratio with H₂⁺
Quantum calculations provide a sharper image of subatomic stress

Apr 20, 2008

GCT

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

god almighty... show your work.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »