Solving the Mystery of \ln{v_{i}} in an Expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter Polymath89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Mystery
Polymath89
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I have a problem taking the log of this expression \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

Now I would get \ln({\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}})(\sum_{i=1}^m{\frac{-u_{i}^2}{v_{i}}})

The author gets, by ignoring the constant multiplicative factors, \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}})

Can anybody tell me where the \ln{v_{i}} comes from and what I have done wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Polymath89 said:
I would get \ln({\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}})(\sum_{i=1}^m{\frac{-u_{i}^2}{v_{i}}})

You are missing m (not that it answers your question).
 
Do you mean

\prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

or

\prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v_i}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]
 
I'm sorry, I just noticed the difference in the terms, first the author uses v as a constant, so he starts with this term:

\prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v})}]

and then he gets, by ignoring the constant multiplicative factors:

\sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v})

Then he replaces v with v_{i}, so \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v_i}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

and gets \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}})

To put all of this in perspective, the author tries to estimate parameters of a GARCH(1,1) model and the first part(with v as a constant) is supposed to be an example of a Maximum Likelihood Estimation, where he estimates the variance v of a random variable X from m observations on X when the underlying distribution is normal with zero mean. Then the first term is just the likelihood of the m observations occurring in that order.
For the second part with v_{i}, he uses MLE to estimate the parameters of the GARCH model. v_{i} is the variance for day i and he assumes that the probability distribution of u_{i} conditional on the variance is normal. Then he gets \prod_{i=1}^m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi v_i}}\exp{(\frac{-u_{i}^2}{2v_{i}})}]

and \sum_{i=1}^m (-\ln{v_{i}}-\frac{u_{i}^2}{v_{i}})
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top