Solving the Mystery of Spontaneous Emission

Goodver
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
By Spontaneous emission it is said that the electron jumps to the higher energy state and then after some time "spontaneously" falls to the lower state.

It is still not clear to me, what makes the electron to "fall" back to the lower state, if higher state is also allowed state and excitation does not violate transition rules, therefore "spontaneously" falling contradicts 1 Newton's law, or it is due to the acting Columb's forces and interactions between electrons in the atom? And what determines time at which electron stays at excited state, I assume it is somehow Fermi statistics?

I am in a master level.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Goodver said:
By Spontaneous emission it is said that the electron jumps to the higher energy state and then after some time "spontaneously" falls to the lower state.

It is still not clear to me, what makes the electron to "fall" back to the lower state, if higher state is also allowed state and excitation does not violate transition rules, therefore "spontaneously" falling contradicts 1 Newton's law, or it is due to the acting Columb's forces and interactions between electrons in the atom? And what determines time at which electron stays at excited state, I assume it is somehow Fermi statistics?

I am in a master level.

Thank you.

The thermodynamically irreverisble transition to the lower energy state is due to the much larger number of large degrees of freedom carried by the photon than the excited molecule.

Fermi's Golden Rule determines the transition rate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi's_golden_rule
 
Goodver said:
It is still not clear to me, what makes the electron to "fall" back to the lower state, if higher state is also allowed state and excitation does not violate transition rules, therefore "spontaneously" falling contradicts 1 Newton's law, or it is due to the acting Columb's forces and interactions between electrons in the atom? And what determines time at which electron stays at excited state, I assume it is somehow Fermi statistics?

It really requires Quantum Field Theory to explain. Basically its not in an eigenstate when the electron and its coupling to the quantised EM field is considered. The usual hand-wavey explanation is its caused by random fluctuations of virtual particles in the vacuum. Its a bit hand-wavey because virtual particles don't really exist - but that is by the by - there is a long thread discussing that at the moment if you want to delve into it.

If you do an internet search there are some papers that go into the detail eg:
http://www.famaf.unc.edu.ar/~vmarconi/moderna1/emision_estimulada_AJP.pdf

I am pretty sure Craigi got what he said from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_emission

I don't think the large degrees of freedom per-se is the reason.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Goodver
Thank you very much!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top