Solving the Mystery of Standing Still in a Moving Train

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fisics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery Train
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the forces acting on a passenger standing in a forward-accelerating train. In Earth's frame of reference, the passenger experiences both the force of friction opposing the train's acceleration and the force of gravity. In the train's frame, the passenger is considered to be at rest, leading to the conclusion that only normal and gravitational forces need to be depicted, along with the inclusion of pseudo forces to account for the acceleration. The importance of correctly representing forces in both inertial and non-inertial frames is emphasized, particularly in drawing free body diagrams (FBDs). Understanding these forces is crucial for solving problems related to motion in accelerating frames.
Fisics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A passenger is standing without slipping in a forward accelerating train. The coefficient of static friction between the feet and floor is 0.47

a) Draw an FBD for the passenger in Earth's frame of reference
b)Draw an FBD for the passenger in the train's frame of reference.

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

Relative to the earth, we know the passenger in traveling with the same acceleration as the train. Therefore, the train has a force applied and a force of friction in the opposite direction. However, does this also apply to the person who is standing still in the train?

b) For this, I am assuming that there is no force applied or force of static friction because the person is standing still. There is a force normal and force of gravity. Is this right? If it is, do I only draw the FBD with only Fg and Fn?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Won't they be the same? In either frame the man accelerates so there must be a force in the direction of acceleration on the man to cause it to accelerate?
 
Fisics said:

Homework Statement



A passenger is standing without slipping in a forward accelerating train. The coefficient of static friction between the feet and floor is 0.47

a) Draw an FBD for the passenger in Earth's frame of reference
b)Draw an FBD for the passenger in the train's frame of reference.

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

Relative to the earth, we know the passenger in traveling with the same acceleration as the train. Therefore, the train has a force applied and a force of friction in the opposite direction.
The force that is accelerating the train and passengers with respect to the Earth has little to do with the force that is accelerating the passenger with respect to the earth
however, does this also apply to the person who is standing still in the train?
If the person is standing still with respect to the train, then that person must be accelerating with respect to the earth, at the same acceleration of the train with respect to the earth.
b) For this, I am assuming that there is no force applied or force of static friction because the person is standing still. There is a force normal and force of gravity. Is this right? If it is, do I only draw the FBD with only Fg and Fn?
Now the use of non-inertial (accelerating) frames should be avoided like the plague except in certain problems such as this one, since it was asked, so you cannot avoid the question unless you choose not to answer it. FBD's in non-inertial frames require the use of pseudo forces (fictitious forces) and real forces. There is no acceleration of the passenger with respect to the train...since they are both accelerating together...so the real force F is balanced by the make-believe force F' = -ma, where 'a' is the acceleration with respect to the earth. Although they cancel, they both should be shown and properly marked, in the x direction. Fg and Fn still show in either case, since the pseudo force in that direction is 0, so those forces in the vertical direction result in the same FBD of forces in the y direction. Pseudo forces are not fun!
 
Thank you! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top