Solving the People Problem: Expressing Available Resources as a Single Fraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Last_Exile
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the effective number of people required to complete a process that takes 25 minutes, with specific roles assigned to different individuals. One person is designated to handle the first 10-minute segment, while any of the three remaining individuals can complete the 15-minute segment. Participants express confusion about how to represent the total number of people involved as a single fraction. The goal is to clarify the contribution of each individual to determine the overall personnel requirement for the process. Ultimately, the conversation seeks a clear expression of the workforce needed for efficient task completion.
Last_Exile
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have a process that takes a total of 25 mins to complete.
5 people are available to do 10 mins of it and 3 people the remainder.
The process can be done many times a day.

I don't know if it makes a difference but the 10 min part is only done by 1 person and the 15 min part can be done by any of the 3.

How can I express the number of people available for the process as a single fraction?

Thanks in advance...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you mean by the number of people for the process as a fraction? Are you saying that 1 of the 5 people does the 10 min part and 1 of the 3 people does the 15 min part?
 
A total of 8 people are involved but not all of them will contribute. I want to be able to say "this process requires x number of people".

1 of the 5 people does the first part but any of the 3 people can do the second.
 
I, for one, still don't understand the question.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top