Solving the Radius of a Collapsing Star in Schwarzschild Geometry

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
I have that \left( \frac{dR}{d \tau} \right)^2 = ( 1 - \epsilon)^2 ( \frac{R_{\text{max}}}{R}-1) describes the radius of the surface of a collapsing star in Schwarzschild geometry. I need to show it falls to R=0 in time \tau = \frac{\pi M}{(1-\epsilon)^{3/2}}

So far I have rearranged to get
\int_{R_{\text{max}}}^0 \sqrt{\frac{R}{R_{\text{max}}-R}} dR = \int_0^\tau (1-\epsilon^2)^{1/2} = (1-\epsilon^2)^{1/2} \tau

How do I do that R integral though?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi latentcorpse! :smile:

that π in the answer suggests you should go for a trig substitution :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi latentcorpse! :smile:

that π in the answer suggests you should go for a trig substitution :wink:

I forgot to mention that R_{\text{max}}=\frac{2M}{1-\epsilon^2}

Making the substitution R=R_{max} \sin^2{\theta}

I get \int_{\pi/2}^0 2 R_{max} \sin^2{\theta} d \theta = - R_{max} \frac{\pi}{2} = - \frac{M \pi}{(1-\epsilon^2)}

equating to (1-\epsilon^2)^{1/2}\tau

we get \tau=-\frac{\pi M}{(1-\epsilon)^{3/2}}

i.e. an extra minus sign. and it can't take a negative amount of time for a star surface to collapse to r=0, i have messed up a sign. i think the limits on my integrals are sound but could you check please?

thanks.
 
You have to choose the sign when taking the square root to agree with dR/d\tau<0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top