Solving the Tsiolokovsky Eqn for Velocity w/Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter James Brady
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Tsiolokovsky equation to express velocity as a function of time while considering a rocket's changing mass. The acceleration is derived using the formula a = (v_e * m_dot) / (m_0 - m_dot * t), where v_e is exhaust velocity and m_dot is mass flow rate. The integral of acceleration leads to a velocity equation that initially produces an illogical result at t = 0. Participants clarify that the constant of integration should be set to v_e * ln(m_0) to correct this issue. The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that this constant resolves the initial velocity problem.
James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4
Hello! I'm doing a little derivation of the Tsiolokovsky equation where I'm trying to find velocity with respect to time, here's what I got so far:

F=ma, a = F/m

Here I replace the force term and the mass term, taking into account that the rocket is losing mass:

##a = \frac{v_e\cdot \dot{x}}{m_0 - \dot{x}\cdot t}##

where:
v = exhaust velocity
m dot = mass flow rate
m naught = initial mass

After this I take the integral of acceleration to get velocity, it's a pretty easy one since the the top two terms, mass flow rate and exhaust velocity, are both constants:

##\int \frac{v_e\cdot\dot{x}}{m_0 - \dot{x}\cdot t} = -v_e\cdot ln(m_0- \dot{x}\cdot t) + c##

Which is the velocity. My problem with this though is that when t = 0, velocity is ##-v_e \cdot ln(m_0)## which doesn't make any sense, right from the start there is an instantaneous velocity? Maybe the constant of integration is suppose to fix that? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if i am correct then , yes , the constant of integration is there to fix that. i haven't checked your calculations as they look fine. c is supposed to be (ve * ln(mo ). if you evaluate the definite integral of the function between t = 0 and t = ti (for any ti) then you'll see that the velocity function
v = -ve * ln(mo - m'ti) + ve*ln(mo)
 
Ah OK, I was just beginning to suspect that I as I was writing that post. Thanks for the help.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top