Solving the Weight of a Meterstaff with a Dynamometer

AI Thread Summary
A meterstaff weighing 0.12 kg is supported at its center while a 0.5 kg weight hangs from one end, creating a torque balance problem. The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted by the support, which involves analyzing the torques around the pinned end. The clockwise torque from the weight and the counter-clockwise torque from the support must equal zero for equilibrium. The correct calculation shows that the force F can be derived from the equation 0.5F = 0.5g + 0.06g, leading to F being approximately 11 N. The participants clarify the distinction between torque and force, emphasizing the importance of using correct terminology in physics calculations.
Izekid
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
A meterstaff who weights 0,12 kg is moveable around of it's ends. In the other staff it hangs a weight of 0,50 kg. The staff is hold in a line by a dynamometer, who is fastened in the middle of the staff. What does the dynamometer show?

I take 0,12*0,50*6,67*10^-11 =4,002*10^-12 / 1^2 =4,002*10^-12

Which is totaly wrong this should be -11

tell me how to do this I am totaly lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am also lost. I got that way trying to read your problem, Could you look for a better translation?
 
Actually, not bad English- not compared to my (put whatever language you like here!).

You have a meter stick pinned to a wall by one end (so that end cannot go up or down but the stick can swing about that point). There is a mass of 0.5 kg at the other end and there is a support at the center of the stick, which itself has mass 0.12 kg. What is the force exerted on the stick by that support?

take 0,12*0,50*6,67*10^-11 =4,002*10^-12 / 1^2 =4,002*10^-12[/quot]
Now this really loses me! I have no idea where that "6,667" came from, not to mention the "10-11"! And why are you multiplying them all together? It would help to show some of your reasoning and not just arithmetic.

Calculate the "torque" about the pinned end of the stick. The mass 0.5 kg has weight 0.5g N (so force is downward) and, since it is 1 m from the pinned end, exerts a torque or 0.5g N-m, clockwise, around the pinned end. Let F be the force exerted by the support. That force is exerted upward and is 0.5 m from the pinned end and so exerts a 0.5F N-m torque, counter-clockwise. We can also, presuming the meter stick is uniform, treat the mass of the stick as if it were concentrated at the center- there is a torque of (0.5)(0.12g)= 0.06g, clockwise. The pinned end, since it is 0 m from itself, contributes no torque. Since the stick does not move, the total torque around any point, and, in particular, around the pinned end must be 0: the counter-clockwise and clockwise torques must be the same. That is
0.5F= 0.5g+ 0.06g= 0.56g. Now solve for F. The answer is NOT exactly 11 N but it is close.
 
Gahh

You know I was using the the the F=Gm1m2/r2 and G is Constant of Gravitation = 6,667*10^-11
Yeah now that I calulated it I also got 0,56 because i thought in another way... but how do I resolv F I'm like this :confused: :confused: :confused: it stands nothing in my book!

I added a pic to those who don't understand my english !

Thx
 

Attachments

  • Pic.JPG
    Pic.JPG
    4.6 KB · Views: 369
Is this the way

The Force for the weight is 0,56nM and then the force must be utilised on the other side to so 0,56+0,56 * 9,82 =10,984=11nM
 
Yes, exactly.

(It would be more correct (in English, at least) to say the "torque" rather than the force, is 0,56 Nm- in any language you shouldn't use the word "force" with two different meanings. {But who am I to talk, we use "pounds" for both mass and force!})

The formula I gave you was 0,5F= 0,56g so that F= 0.56g/0,5= (0,56)(9,81)/0,5. That gives the same thing.

I hope you realize that you are NOT calculating F by (Gm1m2)/r2. You certainly don't need that for things happening on the surface of the earth!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top