Solving the Work Energy Theorem for an Observer Moving Left

AI Thread Summary
A 2kg block is pulled by a 10N force on a frictionless surface, resulting in a calculated final velocity of 14 m/s from a stationary observer's perspective. When considering an observer moving to the left, additional initial and final velocities must be accounted for, leading to different work calculations: 180 J for the moving observer versus 100 J for the stationary one. The discrepancy arises from the definition of work, which involves both force and distance; thus, the distance traveled by the block differs for each observer. Despite the different work values, the Work Energy Theorem (WET) remains applicable because it accounts for the relative motion and the work done in each frame. Understanding these concepts clarifies how WET functions consistently across different observer perspectives.
vu10758
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
A 2kg block at rest on a frictionless surface is pulled for 2s by a 10N horizontal force (pull to the right).

Use the Work Energy Theorem to determine the final velocity from the perspective of an observer moving to the left. Does the WET still work that observer?

I did the calculations and got 14 m/s for the first part. However, I am stuck on the second part. Why does the Work Energy Theorem works for an observer who is moving at constant velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An observer moving to the left would have the effect of giving the block some additional initial and final velocity. Add this into the problem and see how this does or does not affect the answer.
 
I plugged it in the formula w = (1/2)mv^2 - (1/2)mv_o ^2

w = (1/2)m (v^2-v_o^2)
w = (1/2)(2)(14^2-4^2)
w = 180 J.

This is different from

w = (1/2)(2) (10^2 - 0)
w = 100J

So the work in both cases are different. The answer key tells me that WET still works on the observer. But how? I don't know if I am misunderstanding something but if the work are different, how can WET still work?
 
vu10758 said:
So the work in both cases are different. The answer key tells me that WET still works on the observer. But how? I don't know if I am misunderstanding something but if the work are different, how can WET still work?
Something else besides the velocities is different to the two observers. Think about the definition of work.
 
The distance is also different. Thanks, I understand it now.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top