Solving Trig Related Physics Problem: Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockytriton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving trigonometric functions. The user is confused about the transition from one equation to another in the solution process. They understand the initial equation but struggle with how to manipulate it to reach the next step. A key suggestion is to raise both sides of the equation to the second power, which helps clarify the transformation. This method is essential for simplifying the trigonometric expressions involved in the physics problem.
rockytriton
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve a physics problem with some trig in it. I'm looking at a solution but I'm not understanding where it gets from one step to another.

I understand it up to this point:

19.6m + 800m * cos(Z)^2 = 2,000m * sqr(1 - cos(Z)^2) * cos(Z)

But I don't understand how they get from that to:

384m^2 + 31,360m^2 * cos(Z)^2 + 640,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4 =
4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^2 - 4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4

Is this some kind of crazy trig trick that I don't know about?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rockytriton said:
I'm trying to solve a physics problem with some trig in it. I'm looking at a solution but I'm not understanding where it gets from one step to another.

I understand it up to this point:

19.6m + 800m * cos(Z)^2 = 2,000m * sqr(1 - cos(Z)^2) * cos(Z)

But I don't understand how they get from that to:

384m^2 + 31,360m^2 * cos(Z)^2 + 640,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4 =
4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^2 - 4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4

Is this some kind of crazy trig trick that I don't know about?


Raise both sides of the equation to the second power and here you are (approximately, should have been 384.16m^2).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top