Solving Uncertainty in Lab Report Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter AstroKeith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing uncertainty in lab report calculations, specifically for the volume of a cylindrical disk. The calculated volume is V = 4.76×10^-4 m³ with an uncertainty of ± 3.09×10^-6 m³. Participants suggest that the uncertainty should be rounded to match the significant figures of the volume, recommending formats like V = 4.76×10^-4 ± 0.03×10^-4 m³ or V = (4.76 ± 0.03) × 10^-4 m³ for clarity. Properly expressing uncertainty ensures consistency and accuracy in scientific reporting. Clear communication of uncertainty is essential in lab reports.
AstroKeith
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am working on a lab report and am unsure about how to express the uncertainty of one of my calculations.

I am calculating the volume of a cylindrical disk with
height = 0.0258 ± 0.0001 m
radius = 0.0767 ± 0.0002m
Using V=π(r^2)h and the upper/lower bound method, I find:
V= 0.000476205
Uncertainty = ± 0.00000309393
V =4.76⋅10^-4 ± 3.09⋅10^-6

How would I properly express this uncertainty since it is out more decimal places than my answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AstroKeith said:
V =4.76⋅10^-4 ± 3.09⋅10^-6

How would I properly express this uncertainty since it is out more decimal places than my answer?
I would use
V = 4.76×10-4 ± 0.03×10-4 m3
or (even better in my opinion)
V = (4.76 ± 0.03) × 10-4 m3
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top