Solving Wave Frequency & Speed: Questions & Answers

AI Thread Summary
A wave with a frequency of 10 hertz and a speed of 360 m/s raises questions about its wavelength and period. The discussion highlights confusion between using deep water wave equations and basic wave relationships. It clarifies that the frequency refers to the number of waves passing a point per unit time, while another frequency considered was related to vertical wave motion. The correct relationship between wave speed, frequency, and wavelength is expressed as v = fλ. Ultimately, the problem is resolved by recognizing the distinction in definitions of frequency being used.
Fermat
Homework Helper
Messages
864
Reaction score
1
I got this question,

A wave with a frequency of 10 hertz moves at 360 m/s.
Part (a) What is the wavelength of the wave?
Part (b) What is the period of the wave?


I treated this as a deep water wave, and used the equations,

c2 = gl/(2pi)
w2 = gk
c = w/k

to find the wavelength and period of the wave.
But I never used the frequency given (which would imply a period of 0.1 sec) and instead got a period of 231 sec.

Is there something I'm missing?
Is it possible to solve the above question without using deep water equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what those equations mean, but why can't you use the simple relations between frequency, period, and wavelength? They are good for all waves, regardless of type because they are based on the very definitions of the words.
 
I wish I knew what the simple relations were, but those eqns I gave are the only ones I've come across when dealing with waves and the wave equation.

c = wave speed
l is lambda = wavelength
w is omega - angular frequency
k is the wave number

uh, what are the simple relations?
 
Think about it: the units of wavelength are distance. The units for frequency are distance over time. The units for period are just time. So if you have a distance over time and you multiply by a time, what do you get...?
 
Well, I can certainly manipulate T, f and w to give me
w = 2pi.f = 2pi/T
and carry out dimensional analysis etc, but I'm at a loss to see; how does that relate the wavelength to the wave speed in the original problem ?
 
2pi*f? Where are you getting the 2pi? Wavelength is linear, speed is linear.

Through the dimensional analysis:

w=p*s
p=1/f

It really is that simple.
 
Last edited:
I am using T as period.

f is frequency in cycles per second (cps)

one cycle is equivalent to one circular movement = 2pi radans, so f cps = 2pi.f radians per sec givng the angular frequancy as w = 2pi.f

Are you using p as period, yes? then p = 1/f is the same as my T = 1/f.

But how does the wavelength of a wave relate to its speed?
 
OK, sussed it out.
The frequency given in the problem above is the wave frequency and is the number of waves passing along the surface of the water (per unit time).
The frequency I had been working with was the number of times a wave rises and falls, vertically, in a unit time.

Problem solved.
 
Can you tell me what is the deep water wave equation?
Maybe we can discuss later.
 
  • #10
Fermat said:
I wish I knew what the simple relations were, but those eqns I gave are the only ones I've come across when dealing with waves and the wave equation.

What textbook are you using that doesn't have v = f \lambda ?

:confused: :bugeye: :eek: :
 
  • #11
Fermat said:
OK, sussed it out.
The frequency given in the problem above is the wave frequency and is the number of waves passing along the surface of the water (per unit time).
The frequency I had been working with was the number of times a wave rises and falls, vertically, in a unit time.

Problem solved.
Those are two different ways to describe the same measurement.
 
Back
Top