Solving WKB Eigenvalue Problem for Bound States

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is just a quick question -- I'm puzzled by the way this answer sheet represents the potential function.

The question asks us to determine the energy eigenvalues of the bound states of a well where the potential drops abruptly from zero to a depth Vo at x=0, and then increases linearly with position x until at x=a the potential is again zero.

They write:

V(x) = \frac{V_{0}x}{a}
E = V(b) = \frac{V_{0}b}{a}

where b is some point between x=0 and x=a.

But surely the correct representation of the potential function is

V(x) = V_{0}\left(\frac{x}{a}-1\right)

so that V(0) = -Vo, and V(a) = 0. But, using my potential function, I end up with a somewhat different expression for the energy eigenvalues, in the end, than they do. Why do they do it that way? And what's wrong with my pot. function??

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's nothing wrong with your function; if your description of the problem is a faithful reproduction (which is why we prefer if the original question is reproduced verbatim, rather than paraphrased) then "they" got it wrong.
 
Gokul43201 said:
There's nothing wrong with your function; if your description of the problem is a faithful reproduction (which is why we prefer if the original question is reproduced verbatim, rather than paraphrased) then "they" got it wrong.

Ok. Thanks for confirming that.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top