MHB Solving $(x+2011)(x+2012)(x+2013)(x+2014)+1=0$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation $(x+2011)(x+2012)(x+2013)(x+2014)+1=0$ is discussed with a focus on finding real solutions. Participants express gratitude for insightful solutions shared by others, highlighting collaborative problem-solving. Different methods to approach the equation are appreciated, emphasizing the value of diverse perspectives in mathematics. The discussion showcases a supportive environment for learning and skill application. Overall, the thread reinforces the importance of community in tackling complex mathematical challenges.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all real solutions of the equation $(x+2011)(x+2012)(x+2013)(x+2014)+1=0$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find all real solutions of the equation $(x+2011)(x+2012)(x+2013)(x+2014)+1=0$

Let $x+2013=t$, then the equation is:
$$(t-2)(t-1)t(t+1)+1=0 \Rightarrow t^4-2t^3-2t^2+2t+1=0$$
$$\Rightarrow t^4+t^2+1-2t^3-2t^2+2t=0 \Rightarrow (t^2-t-1)^2=0 \Rightarrow t^2-t-1=0$$
The solutions to the above quadratic are:
$$t=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2},\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}$$
$$\Rightarrow x=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}-2013,\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}-2013$$
 
Thanks, Pranav for your neat solution!

My solution:

Well, it couldn't be said that it's my method, it was how I remembered how this kind of problem be tackled that I just applied the skill to this problem, so I couldn't really take the credit::)

Let $a=x+\dfrac{2014+2013+2012+2011}{4}=x+2012.5$, then the original equation becomes $(a+1.5)(a+0.5)(a-0.5)(a-1.5)+1=0$ or simply $a^4-2.5a^2+1.5625=0$ and solving it for $a^2$ we get $(a^2-1.25)^2=0$.

Hence, $a=\pm \sqrt{1.25}$ and therefore, $x=\pm \sqrt{1.25}-2012.5$, upon checking, these two solutions do indeed satisfy the original equation and we're done.
 
anemone said:
Thanks, Pranav for your neat solution!

My solution:

Well, it couldn't be said that it's my method, it was how I remembered how this kind of problem be tackled that I just applied the skill to this problem, so I couldn't really take the credit::)

Let $a=x+\dfrac{2014+2013+2012+2011}{4}=x+2012.5$, then the original equation becomes $(a+1.5)(a+0.5)(a-0.5)(a-1.5)+1=0$ or simply $a^4-2.5a^2+1.5625=0$ and solving it for $a^2$ we get $(a^2-1.25)^2=0$.

Hence, $a=\pm \sqrt{1.25}$ and therefore, $x=\pm \sqrt{1.25}-2012.5$, upon checking, these two solutions do indeed satisfy the original equation and we're done.

one can always take credit for applying skill. applying skill is a part of skillset(Clapping)
 
Golden Quadratic: $\phi \phi $-$\phi $-1 = 0

1) $\phi $-1 = 1/$\phi $
2) 1 = $\phi \phi $-$\phi $

Given: 1-2+1 = 0
($\phi \phi $-$\phi $)-2+1 = 0 From 2
($\phi $-2)($\phi $+1)+1 = 0 Factoring
($\phi $-2)(1/$\phi $)($\phi $)($\phi $+1)+1 = 0 Multiplicitive Inverse
($\phi $-2)($\phi $-1)($\phi $)($\phi $+1)+1 = 0 From 1

Let x=$\phi $-2013 where $\phi $ is either root of the Golden Quadratic
(x + 2011) (x + 2012) (x + 2013) (x + 2014)+1 = 0 QED
 
RLBrown said:
Golden Quadratic: $\phi \phi $-$\phi $-1 = 0

1) $\phi $-1 = 1/$\phi $
2) 1 = $\phi \phi $-$\phi $

Given: 1-2+1 = 0
($\phi \phi $-$\phi $)-2+1 = 0 From 2
($\phi $-2)($\phi $+1)+1 = 0 Factoring
($\phi $-2)(1/$\phi $)($\phi $)($\phi $+1)+1 = 0 Multiplicitive Inverse
($\phi $-2)($\phi $-1)($\phi $)($\phi $+1)+1 = 0 From 1

Let x=$\phi $-2013 where $\phi $ is either root of the Golden Quadratic
(x + 2011) (x + 2012) (x + 2013) (x + 2014)+1 = 0 QED

Thanks, RLBrown for participating! You know, I wouldn't have thought to approach it this way and thank you again for showing us the other good method to solve this challenge problem. :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top