MHB Solving x Equation: Get Expert Help from Casio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casio1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equations 2/3x - 3 = -x + 2 and 2/3x = -x + 5, it's important to correctly add x to the left-hand side (LHS). The correct approach is to express x as 3/3x to maintain consistent coefficients. Alternatively, multiplying each term by three can simplify the process by eliminating fractions. This method can make the equation easier to manage and solve. Clear steps and careful manipulation of coefficients are crucial for finding the solution.
Casio1
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I have not experienced this one before and would appreciate a little help.

2/3x - 3 = - x + 2
2/3x = - x + 5

Now how do I add x to the LHS, is it;

2/4x or 3/3x or am I completely off the mark?

Kind regards

Casio
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Casio said:
I have not experienced this one before and would appreciate a little help.

$\frac{2}{3}x - 3 = -x + 2$
$\frac{2}{3}x = -x + 5$

Now how do I add x to the LHS, is it;

$\frac{2}{4}x$ or $\frac{3}{3}x$ or am I completely off the mark?Kind regards

Casio

If you want to add $x$ to the LHS then the coefficient (number infront of x) must be 1. For fractions this means the top and the bottom must be the same value. $\frac{3x}{3}$ is a good choice in this case.

You may find it easier to multiply each term by three as your first step to clear the fraction altogether.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top