Solving x^y=y^x & x+y=6 with Deduction

  • Thread starter Thread starter arka.sharma
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equations x^y = y^x and x+y = 6. Possible solutions identified include (x=4, y=2), (x=3, y=3), and (x=2, y=4). A graphical approach is suggested to solve the equation (6-y)^y = y^(6-y), where plotting both sides can help identify intersection points. It is noted that while graphical and numerical methods can be used, there is no straightforward algebraic solution. The conversation emphasizes the utility of visual representation in finding and proving all potential roots.
arka.sharma
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I was given two equations back in my school days to solve for both x and y it is as follows

x^y = y^x & x+y = 6

Now it can be seen that following would be possible solutions (x=4,y=2),(x=3,y=3),(x=2,y=4).
But is there any deductive way to solve this ?

Regards,
Arka
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solving (6-y)^y == y^(6-y)
Which can be represented graphically.
 
Thanks for your reply. But how to solve the equation (6-y)^y == y^(6-y) ?
 
Put the RHS and the LHS of the equation on a graphic and see where these curve cut each other.
You will find the root that you already know.
If there are other roots, you will likely find out.
Afterward, you might find out arguments to "prove" you found all the roots.
The graphical representation will help a lot.
 
arka.sharma said:
Thanks for your reply. But how to solve the equation (6-y)^y == y^(6-y) ?
You were told to solve it graphically. It can also be solved using a numerical iteration method. If you are looking for an elementary algebraic way of solving it, there is none.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top