Troubleshooting f(E)q(-E) + f(-E)q(E) - Page 63, 64 equations 7.6, 7.7, 7.8

  • Thread starter Thread starter koolmodee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Troubleshooting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on troubleshooting the equations f(E)q(-E) + f(-E)q(E) as presented in the context of quantum field theory (QFT) from the provided text. The user attempted to substitute a new variable x(E) = q(E) + f(E)/(term) but encountered issues obtaining the expected results. A participant clarified that equation 7.6 involves an integral and emphasized the need to rearrange the variable substitution to isolate q(E) and subsequently determine q(-E) for simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of variable substitution techniques
  • Ability to manipulate mathematical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the integral techniques used in quantum field theory
  • Study variable substitution methods in calculus
  • Examine the derivation and application of equations 7.6, 7.7, and 7.8 from the provided text
  • Practice simplifying complex equations in QFT contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, mathematicians focusing on integral calculus, and anyone seeking to enhance their skills in manipulating complex equations in theoretical physics.

koolmodee
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
We have f(E)q(-E) + f(-E)q(E)

now change to x(E)=q(E) + f(E)/ (term)

and get -(f(E)f(-E))/(term)

I plugged the changed variable in, but didn't get the result, any hints how to proceed?

I got that from page 63, 64 equations 7.6, 7.7, 7.8 from this text: http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/ms-qft-DRAFT.pdf

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
?? 7.6, 7.7, and 7.8 are nothing like what you give here! 7.6 involves an integral and "x" is a change of variable in the integral.
 
Just rearrange your variable substitution to isolate q(E), and then determine q(-E), and substitute into equation (7.6) and simplify.

No offense, but this should be pretty straightforward for someone who's studying QFT.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
27K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K