I Some help with deriving svedberg equilibrium equatio please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the analytical solution of the centrifugation equilibrium equation in analytical ultracentrifugation. A user seeks clarification on the mathematical steps involved in manipulating the equation, particularly after removing the frictional coefficient and rearranging terms. They express uncertainty about the calculus concepts needed to progress from one equation to another, specifically regarding derivatives and logarithmic transformations. Other participants provide guidance on the necessary calculus principles and suggest using the homework template for future questions. The conversation highlights the importance of foundational math skills in understanding complex physical chemistry equations.
HS-experiment
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hello Physics Forums,

I am studying the equations related to analytical ultracentrifugation. The equation I am interested in describes centrifugation equilibrium, ie at the point in time when sedimentation is balanced with diffusion in the ultracentrifuge. Fortunately, unlike the Lamm equation, this one can be solved analytically.

I found the following in a textbook. Can someone please explain to me the steps taken going from the first equation to the next?

## \frac {RT}{Nf } \frac{dC}{dr} = \frac{M(1-\bar vp)w^2rC}{Nf} ##

We now write the derivative as dC/dr, because at equilibrium, C is a function only of r, not also of t. We can factor out the Nf on both sides and again rearrange to

## \frac{dln(C)}{d(r^2)}=\frac{M(1-\bar vp)w^2}{2RT} ##

where
R = gas constant
T = temperature
N = avogadro's number
f = frictional coefficient
C = concentration of solute
r = distance from center of rotor
M = molar mass
## \bar v ## = partial specific volume
p = density of solvent
## w^2 ## = rotational velocity
In particular, I don't know what to do after I remove Nf and move RT to the right hand side of the equation.

## \frac{dC}{dr}=\frac{M(1-\bar vp)w^2rC}{RT} ##

I think that it is something simple, but my math ability is really bad.

Many thanks.

BTW This is taken fom the textbook 'Principles of Physical Biochemistry', second edition.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a little first year calculus: ## \frac{d \, \ln{C}}{dC}=\frac{1}{C} ## so that ## \frac{dC}{C}=d ( \ln{C}) ##. Meanwhile ## \frac{d (r^2)}{dr}=2r ## so that ## r \, dr=\frac{1}{2} d( r^2) ##. ## \\ ## Recommendation is to use the homework template next time and post in the homework section. I think this one is ok where it is, but the Mentors might move it to the homework section.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes HS-experiment
Hi Charles. Thanks a lot for your explanation and sorry if I placed this question in the wrong directory. My calculus course is coming back to me through a haze .. I forgot that when you are taking a derivative you need to add the fraction in front ## \frac{1}{2}d(r^2) ## to end up with the correct answer. I should really take a refresher course some time :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top