Some Kinetic Gas Theory questions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter carvas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Kinetic Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around kinetic gas theory, specifically focusing on the interpretation of velocity intervals in isotropic cases and the derivation of molecular impingement rates on surfaces. Participants explore the mathematical formulations and physical interpretations involved in these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the representation of a velocity interval defined by dv^3 = dv_x dv_y dv_z and its transformation to dv^3 = 4 \pi v^2 dv, suggesting a need for clarification on spherical coordinates.
  • Another participant explains that the transformation is due to using spherical coordinates, where the integrand depends only on the radial component |v|, and that the integrals over angles are implicit in the expression.
  • There is a discussion about deriving the molecular impingement rate, with one participant stating that the rate is proportional to the speed and particle number density, and that it should also depend on the area and time.
  • Participants discuss the analogy between Cartesian coordinates for velocity and spherical coordinates, confirming that similar transformations can be applied to velocities.
  • One participant raises a question about the differential element for velocities, seeking confirmation on its form, which is acknowledged by another participant with a note on potential ambiguity.
  • A later post introduces the concept of molecular flux rate, relating it to the number of molecules and their velocities, while also mentioning equilibrium conditions and relevant equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical transformations and physical interpretations discussed, but there are unresolved questions regarding the derivation of the molecular impingement rate and the specific forms of the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the derivation steps and the implications of the equations, particularly regarding the definitions and conditions under which the molecular flux rate is derived.

carvas
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm having a problem interpreting how a velocity interval defined by [itex]dv^3 = dv_x dv_y dv_z[/itex], being an isotropic case, why do we write it like this:

[itex]dv^3 = 4 \pi v^2 dv[/itex]

And also, how can I derive the molecular impingement rate over a surface? I saw at a book, but I don't understand it, that, considering only particles with velocity [itex]v_x[/itex] will hit the surface, in order to get the molecular impingement rate, [itex]J[/itex], we have to:

[itex]J = \frac{1}{V} \int_ 0^{\infty} v_x dN = \frac{n\, v_{avg}}{4}[/itex]

Where [itex]dN[/itex] is the number of molecules, [itex]n = N/V[/itex], being [itex]V[/itex] the volume and [itex]v_{avg}[/itex] the average velocity.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The rewriting is due to using spherical coordinates (|v|,phi,theta) instead of cartesian coordiantes (vx,vy,vz).
Spherical coordinates are indicated if your integrand depends only on the radial component |v|, not on the direction. The reason that the integrals over theta and phi are not seen is that they are already carried out (which for a given |v| gives 4pi |v|²). I cannot help you with the 2nd part at the moment.
 
Last edited:
If the direction x is perpendicular to the surface in question, then v_x carries particles across the surface. The rate they are carried across is the speed times the particle number density-- note the units of that is a per area per time. So to get a number of particles crossing, you need to multiply that rate by the area and the time. It should make perfect sense that the number of particles should be proportional to the area and the time, and it should also be proportional to the speed and the density of particles. There is nothing else it should depend on, so multiplying them all together should work, and indeed it does give the unit of "particles" when you do that.
 
Timo said:
The rewriting is due to using spherical coordinates (|v|,phi,theta) instead of cartesian coordiantes (vx,vy,vz).
Spherical coordinates are indicated if your integrand depends only on the radial component |v|, not on the direction. The reason that the integrals over theta and phi are not seen is that they are already carried out (which for a given |v| gives 4pi |v|²). I cannot help you with the 2nd part at the moment.

Thank you Timo!

So you have 3 coordinates in cartesian space [itex](v_x, v_y, v_z)[/itex], and you have that [itex]v^2 = v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2[/itex], so you're saying, that in analogy with
position in spherical coordinates like [itex](r,\theta,\phi)[/itex] I can just make the same thing to velocities [itex](v,\theta,\phi)[/itex], right?

Just another thing, the differential element for the velocities is just: [itex]dv^3 = v^2\,dv\,\sin \theta\,d\theta\,d \phi[/itex] ?
 
Last edited:
Ken G said:
If the direction x is perpendicular to the surface in question, then v_x carries particles across the surface. The rate they are carried across is the speed times the particle number density-- note the units of that is a per area per time. So to get a number of particles crossing, you need to multiply that rate by the area and the time. It should make perfect sense that the number of particles should be proportional to the area and the time, and it should also be proportional to the speed and the density of particles. There is nothing else it should depend on, so multiplying them all together should work, and indeed it does give the unit of "particles" when you do that.

Thank you Ken!

Yes, making a dimensional analysis really makes it easy to understand. :)
 
carvas said:
So you have 3 coordinates in cartesian space [itex](v_x, v_y, v_z)[/itex], and you have that [itex]v^2 = v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2[/itex], so you're saying, that in analogy with
position in spherical coordinates like [itex](r,\theta,\phi)[/itex] I can just make the same thing to velocities [itex](v,\theta,\phi)[/itex], right?

Just another thing, the differential element for the velocities is just: [itex]dv^3 = v^2\,dv\,\sin \theta\,d\theta\,d \phi[/itex] ?
"Yes" to both. Except perhaps for the ambiguity of your last equation where "v" appears on both sides of the equation but means different things - I think we both know what is meant.
 
carvas said:
And also, how can I derive the molecular impingement rate over a surface?

Thank you!

The molecular flux rate (∫ = nivi)for an ideal gas is the product of the number of molecules per cubic meter having a component of motion toward the incident surface (ni) and the mean axial molecular velocity normal to and toward that surface (vi).

Under conditions of equilibrium, ni = n/2, where n is the molecular number density in molecules per cubic meter: n = P/kT.

vi = (2/π)1/2 σ, where σ is the root-mean-square axial velocity (normal to and toward the surface): σ = (P/nm)1/2, where m is the molecular mass of a gas having only a single molecular mass, and the mean impulse mass of a gas having more than one molecular mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K