Some other curious questions about stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pattielli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curious Stars
AI Thread Summary
Stars and meteors are fundamentally different, with stars being massive celestial bodies like the sun, while meteors are small rocks or dust that burn up in Earth's atmosphere. Both stars and meteors move through the galaxy, influenced by gravitational forces. The sun, along with other stars, orbits the galactic center due to this gravitational attraction, maintaining a tangential velocity that prevents collisions. Detailed astronomical measurements can reveal the movement of stars relative to one another. Understanding these movements highlights the dynamic nature of celestial bodies within the galaxy.
Pattielli
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Do they move in the galaxy or just stand still ? How can we check if they are moving ? I mean meteors, not planets...
And Would you please tell me what makes them move ?

Thank you very much,
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Stars & meteors are very different things. Stars are things like our sun. A meteor is a bit of rock or dust that enters the Earth's atmosphere and burns up. Both move through the galaxy. Everything in a solar system (planets, asteroids, meteor-material, etc.) orbits its sun. The sun goes around the center of the galaxy due to the gravitational attraction between the sun and the rest of the galaxy. Gravity doesn't make it all collide together because the sun has a velocity (speed & direction of motion) that is tangential (sideways) to that gravitational pull. So, the sun loops around the galactic center in a huge orbit just like the planets orbit the sun an the moon orbits the Earth, etc.

If you took detailed measurements like an astronomer (comparing the positions of the stars relative to each other), you could see them moving.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top