Something like category theory but for physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential for a unified framework in physics, akin to how category theory unifies various branches of mathematics. Participants highlight the importance of mathematical structures, such as lattices and algebras, in classifying physical theories, suggesting that a comprehensive resource is lacking for those below a graduate level in mathematics. Classical field theory is mentioned as a general framework that encompasses multiple areas of physics, while the concept of viewing all theories as probability theories is proposed as a more general approach. The conversation also points to existing resources, including articles and books, that touch on these topics but acknowledges the need for more accessible literature. Overall, the quest for a unifying framework in physics remains an open and challenging area of study.
Geofleur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
426
Reaction score
177
I was impressed how in R. Geroch's book, Mathematical Physics, category theory is used to unify so many different branches of mathematics. Is there a single framework that, in a similar way, unifies many or all branches of physics? If so, what are some good resources for learning it?

So far, the closest I have seen is perhaps the mathematics of linearity, of multi-linear maps and objects on which such maps act. Is there something better? It would be great to be able to see each area of physics as instantiating some one thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classical field theory is one very general framework: classical mechanics, E&M, and thermodynamics can all be treated this way.
 
  • Like
Likes Geofleur
Is there a good book that presents it in this way?
 
I think the most general framework is the one that views all theories of physics (including the classical ones) as probability theories. This topic is unfortunately extremely difficult. I don't think there's a good book on the topic, at least not at a level that can be understood by someone below the level of a graduate student in mathematics.

I only understand bits and pieces of it. I think I understand enough to say that a really good book on this topic should identify mathematical structures (lattices, algebras) that can be associated with every set of statements that can be considered a "theory of physics", and then classify theories by additional conditions satisfied by these structures. Then the book should describe the most interesting classes of theories. There is however no such book. The closest thing I can think of is the article "Quantum probability theory" by Redei and Summers, which contains a classification of (generalized) probability theories defined by von Neumann algebras.

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601158
 
  • Like
Likes Geofleur
Fredrik said:
I only understand bits and pieces of it. I think I understand enough to say that a really good book on this topic should identify mathematical structures (lattices, algebras) that can be associated with every set of statements that can be considered a "theory of physics", and then classify theories by additional conditions satisfied by these structures. Then the book should describe the most interesting classes of theories.

That's exactly the sort of thing I had in mind with my question! If there are no books on the subject, and if the only paper is about the quantum aspects, perhaps this would be a good research topic?
 
The paper mentions that non-commutative von Neumann algebras lead to classical theories, so the classical theories are included in the framework defined by the paper. Unfortunately I don't understand this well enough to explain the details.
 
Thanks for the information, I appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top