Something that's bothered me for a while

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Manchot
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of energy eigenstates in simple systems, particularly in the context of non-interacting electrons and the effects of spin-spin coupling. It is established that while secondary effects like Zeeman and Stark splittings create new states, they do not increase the overall number of states available for fermions. Instead, these splittings break the degeneracy of existing states, resulting in linear combinations of the original states without altering occupancy numbers. The absorption spectrum of bulk gallium arsenide exemplifies this, showing a density of states consistent with simple theoretical predictions, adjusted for spin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy eigenstates in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with spin-spin coupling effects
  • Knowledge of Zeeman and Stark effects
  • Basic principles of fermionic occupancy in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the implications of Zeeman and Stark splittings in quantum systems
  • Explore the concept of degeneracy in quantum mechanics
  • Study the absorption spectrum analysis of semiconductor materials like gallium arsenide
  • Learn about linear combinations of quantum states and their physical significance
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in semiconductor physics who are exploring the effects of spin and energy state degeneracy in quantum systems.

Manchot
Messages
470
Reaction score
5
In simple systems (e.g., a periodic potential with non-interacting electrons), we speak of the energy eigenstates of the system. If we include secondary effects like spin-spin coupling, we'll often see a splitting of the energy levels into multiple states. Assuming that the amount of splitting is much less than other energy scales in the system, the overall effect would be to increase the degeneracy of each state. Why, then, can we not "fit" more fermions into each state than what the simple theory predicts? For example, if you measure the absorption spectrum of bulk gallium arsenide, you'll find the density of states is approximately what the simple theory predicts, multiplied by 2 for spin. If I didn't know any better, I'd think that all of the second-order effects would increase the degeneracy by several fold.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Manchot said:
In simple systems (e.g., a periodic potential with non-interacting electrons), we speak of the energy eigenstates of the system. If we include secondary effects like spin-spin coupling, we'll often see a splitting of the energy levels into multiple states. Assuming that the amount of splitting is much less than other energy scales in the system, the overall effect would be to increase the degeneracy of each state.
No, the splitting breaks the degeneracy of the existing state. The Zeeman and Stark splittings are perfect examples.
Why, then, can we not "fit" more fermions into each state than what the simple theory predicts? For example, if you measure the absorption spectrum of bulk gallium arsenide, you'll find the density of states is approximately what the simple theory predicts, multiplied by 2 for spin. If I didn't know any better, I'd think that all of the second-order effects would increase the degeneracy by several fold.
The splitting doesn't increase the number of states, it just creates new states that are linear combinations of the old ones. Where the original states were degenerate (same energy), the new states are spread apart in energy, but the number of states is unchanged. That's why the occupancy numbers don't change.
 
Duh, I completely forgot about that. That makes more sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
870
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K