- 3,181
- 57
I found this quite interesting. Enjoy.
http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~plu/publications/Science_315_1106_2007.pdf
http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~plu/publications/Science_315_1106_2007.pdf
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion centers around the mathematical and artistic significance of tiling in Medieval Middle Eastern architecture, particularly focusing on the discovery and proof of regular tilings of the plane by Muslim artists. It explores the historical context, the nature of proof in mathematics, and the cultural implications of these findings.
Participants express differing views on whether the Muslim artists considered their findings as a theorem, and there is no consensus on the nature of their proofs or understanding of the mathematics involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of cultural biases in evaluating historical mathematical contributions.
The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the historical context of mathematical proofs and the cultural interpretations of rigor in mathematics. There are unresolved questions about the depth of mathematical knowledge possessed by the artists and the standards of proof they may have adhered to.
discovering 17 regular tilings is strictly distinct from showing that there are precisely 17 regular tilings.
Crosson said:Granted their 'proof by example' is not acceptable by our standards, but that is a judgement issue of rigor, what is not in doubt is that they held it as a theorem in their day.
I, for one, doubt that they held it as a theorem.