What is the difference between slat and tile arrays in active phased arrays?

  • Thread starter Thread starter senmeis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arrays
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between slat and tile arrays in active phased arrays, focusing on their structure, the types of antennas used, and the radiating directions of these antennas. It includes technical aspects and conceptual clarifications related to antenna design and packaging.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the primary difference between slat and tile arrays relates to the packaging of electronics on PCBs rather than the antennas themselves.
  • One participant notes that slat arrays have PCBs arranged edge-on to the face of the array, allowing more space for electronics, while tile arrays have PCBs flat on the face, which reduces component space but may lower costs.
  • There is uncertainty about whether the elements in the figures are the same, with some suggesting that Figure 2 shows patch antennas perpendicular to the array face, while Figure 3 shows elements that are parallel.
  • Another participant questions the radiating direction of the elements in Figure 3, asserting that patch antennas typically radiate parallel to the pad plane.
  • One response explains that patch antennas can radiate perpendicularly due to their design, which resembles two slots cut in a ground plane, creating a broadside array effect.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of radiation from slots and patches, with some participants elaborating on the mechanisms behind radiation in these antennas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the types of antennas used in slat and tile arrays, as well as the radiating directions of these antennas. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of the antenna elements and their radiation characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the radiating directions and types of antennas depend on specific assumptions about antenna design and configurations that are not fully clarified in the discussion.

senmeis
Messages
77
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I’m reading the attached pdf article at https://www.microwavejournal.com/art...neration-radar about tile architecture in active phased arrays. Please help me with the following two questions.

1. Figure 2: Are this figure and the attached architecture (array.jpg) referred to the same structure?
2. It seems the radiating direction of the elements in tile arrays (Figure 3) is perpendicular to the plain. What about the radiating direction in slat arrays?

Senmeis
 

Attachments

  • Tile Arrays Accelerate the Evolution to Next.pdf
    Tile Arrays Accelerate the Evolution to Next.pdf
    253.5 KB · Views: 392
  • Array.jpg
    Array.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 218
Engineering news on Phys.org
It looks as if the difference between slat and tile arrays is nothing to do with the antenna itself but is concerned with the packaging of the electronics on to PCBs.
The slat array is an older system where the PCBs are arranged edge on to the face of the array, proving lots of space for electronics. The tile arrays use PCBs flat on the face of the array, so that there is much less component space but it is cheaper.
 
I’m not sure if the elements are the same. It seems to me the elements in Figure 2 are patch antennas which are perpendicular to the face of the array, but the elements in Figure 3 are parallel to the face of the array.
 
Sorry, I do not have access to the Microwave journal. It is possible the tile uses patch antennas and the slat uses printed dipoles.
 
senmeis said:
I’m not sure if the elements are the same. It seems to me the elements in Figure 2 are patch antennas which are perpendicular to the face of the array, but the elements in Figure 3 are parallel to the face of the array.
This is correct, however both elements radiate perpendicular to the array plane.
 
The original article is already attached. I don’t understand why elements in Figure 3 radiate perpendicular to the array plane. I always think the radiating direction of patch antenna is parallel to the pad plane.
 
Because they are a metal surface approximately one-half wavelength that is mounted on a dielectric above a ground plane. It resonates and sets up big fields at its edges (from patch to ground plane). These fields resemble those from a slot radiator and launch radiation normal to the patch.
 
senmeis said:
The original article is already attached. I don’t understand why elements in Figure 3 radiate perpendicular to the array plane. I always think the radiating direction of patch antenna is parallel to the pad plane.
A patch resembles two slots cut in the ground plane. Each slot radiates over a complete 180 degree sector normal to its length. So you are right there is radiation along the ground plane. But as there are two slots, they form a broadside array with half wave spacing and the same phase, so they cancel radiation along the ground plane, leaving a maximum normal to the ground plane.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: marcusl
tech99 said:
A patch resembles two slots cut in the ground plane.
Incidentally, the radiation from a slot is caused when electrons in the metal are accelerated by the transmitter. The fields in the slot do not do the radiating.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcusl

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K