Sound wave spreading radially question

AI Thread Summary
Sound waves emitted from a coherent source spread radially, resulting in varying sound intensity at different locations. The intensity decreases as the distance from the source increases due to the inverse-square law, meaning sound at point B is more intense than at point A. However, the quality of sound, defined by its frequency, remains consistent across locations when emitting a pure tone. In a scenario with two coherent sources, sound intensity varies based on interference patterns, with locations closer to maxima experiencing louder sounds. The discussion confirms that while intensity changes with distance, the tonal quality does not.
nophun6
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I have a question dealing with sound waves.
agag.jpg



This figure shows waves spreading radially outward from a coherent source located at the center. The center spot represents a coherent source emitting at a constant frequency. Black indicates maxima (positive peaks) and white indicating minima (negative troughs)
a) The source is a speaker emitting a pure tone. Quantitatively speaking, would you hear a different sound intensity at points A and
B?
b) Is the quality of the sound (the tone) dependent
on location? That is, would you expect a
qualitatively different sound at different
locations?

I remember that the intenesity of sound decreases as sound increases because as the wave spreads further from the source to the areas of low and high pressure respecitively gain and lose pressure (compressions and rarefactions)
So would this mean that the sound you hear at point B is more intense than the sound you hear at point A?
And thus the quality of the sound is dependant on location?

thanks for the help;
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A) correct. Since the energy of the wave is spread out over the surface of an ever-increasing sphere, the intensity drops off as an inverse-square proportion with distance from source.

B) No. "Quality" is referring to what combination of frequencies you are hearing. This is a pure tone, and the frequency does not change as a function of distance from source.
 
Ah, I see, thank you for your help. I have another question...
349a8a6e.jpg

This picture depicts 2-source interference. There are 2 coherent sources emitting at the same frequency. Black indicates maxima, white indicates minima and pure gray corresponds to total destructive interference. Rank locations A-D according the intensities that a listener at each
location would experience (loudest to quietest).

So, in order from most intense to least: D(most intense) > C > A > B

I reasoned this from the fact that D is the closest and lies on a black line (maxima) and B, although not the furthest, lies in a grey region which means there is destructive interference.
Is this correct?
Thanks for the help!
 
Yes, that's correct. Cool diagrams, BTW.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top