Sound waves in a 1-molecule thick liquid

AI Thread Summary
In a thought experiment involving a 1-molecule thick layer of liquid on an impenetrable surface, applying sound waves would create peaks and valleys in the liquid, with the underlying structure being the liquid molecules themselves. When sandwiched between two impenetrable plates, the liquid could still transmit sound waves, which would behave similarly to how they travel through air, as sound is a compression wave. The analogy of a slinky demonstrates that sound waves are compression/rarefaction waves, not transverse waves. If the space between the plates contained air instead of liquid, sound waves would still propagate normally. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the nature of sound waves and their interaction with different mediums.
philawesomephy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Imagine a 1-molecule thick layer of liquid, evenly dispersed across a perfectly flat surface. This surface is (for this thought experiment) impenetrable and sound does not pass through it; it is unable to resonate or vibrate.

If we apply sound waves or some other frequency/wave generation to the liquid, what will happen? Will it experience peaks and valleys? If so, what will be "under" the peaks?

What if this 1-molecule thick liquid is sandwiched between two of these impenetrable plates (that is, two plates 1 liquid-molecule's width apart, with this liquid in between them)? Can waves pass through the liquid? If so, how would they form and what would they look like? What if we have no liquid, but air in this space between the plates? Remember that the plates themselves do not resonate.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sound waves are compression waves and would smply move molecules closer or further apart. Assuming the source of the waves was strong enough to overcome the intermolecular forces they would travel normally.

When sound moves through air in a room it doesn't lift up in front of the speaker. I think you are taking the analogy of a wave on a string too literally.
 
As mgb_phys points out, sound waves are not transverse waves; they are compression/rarefaction waves.

Take a slinky, one end in each hand. To send a transverse wave through it, you'd wave one hand perpendicular to the length of the slinky. To send a compression wave through it, you'd push one hand in the direction of the slinky's long axis (squishing it).

Your petrie dish of liquid would transmit sound waves just fine.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top