Sound waves through air column

AI Thread Summary
Resonance in an air column occurs at various lengths, which means the natural frequency of a tuning fork does not need to match the air column's natural frequency for resonance to happen. The air column can resonate at specific frequencies determined by its length and the speed of sound, with odd harmonics playing a significant role. For resonance to be effective, the sound waves must return in phase with the waves produced by the tuning fork, leading to increased sound intensity at certain frequencies. However, the reflected sound wave may not always be in phase with the incoming wave, depending on the specific conditions of the air column. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between the tuning fork and the air column's resonant behavior.
tastoon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hello guys, I'm having problems understanding why if we were to have a tuning fork that vibrates at a particular natural frequency, it will resonate at many different lengths of air column (which means different natural frequency of air column). Does this mean that the natural frequency of the tuning fork does not need to be equal to the natural frequency of the air column for resonance to occur?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tastoon, Welcome to Physics Forums!
To search for answers to your question I entered the search terms "tuning fork resonate air column" and got lots of hits. Here are two sites which may help explain the difference between "natural frequency of the tuning fork" and "resonant frequency of the open tube". The key is that odd harmonics resonate also.

"The various possible frequencies at which a tube may resonate are definite and fixed in value. They depend upon the length of the pipe and the velocity of sound in air. In a cylinder of air, the length (L) of the column of molecules vibrating must be some odd number multiple of the wavelength of the tuning fork oscillation:
n l = 4 L
In this equation: n = an odd integer (1, 3, 5, ..); l is the wavelength of the sound wave; and L is the length of the air column."
http://chemmovies.unl.edu/chemistry/dochem/DoChem028.html

A simple experiment you can do to search for odd harmonics of tuning fork:
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/labman2/soundvel.htm

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still don't get it =( . If the frequency of the sound wave entering the tube equals to the reflected sound wave's frequency, won't resonance always occur since driving frequency = reflected frequency?

From http://chemmovies.unl.edu/chemistry/dochem/DoChem028.html , it states that, "It is observed when the sound waves reflected from the closed end of the tube return to the top of the tube in phase with the new waves being produced by the tuning fork. The direct and reflected waves combine their effects. Very noticeable increases in sound intensity can be heard at certain frequencies in conjunction with certain tube lengths." However, isn't the reflected sound wave produced will always be in phase with the incoming sound wave?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top