Space Curve Question: Showing Derivative of t wrt s

  • Thread starter Thread starter noospace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating the relationship between the second derivative of time with respect to arc length, specifically showing that \(\frac{d^2t}{ds^2} = -\frac{\dot{\alpha} \cdot \ddot{\alpha}}{\abs{\alpha}^4}\). The user initially struggles with the differentiation process but clarifies that \(\dot{\alpha} = \alpha'\) and successfully derives the necessary equations. Key steps include applying the inverse function theorem and recognizing that \(\beta'\) is a unit vector field, leading to the conclusion that \(\dot{\alpha} \cdot \beta'' = 0\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of regular parametrized curves in \(\mathbb{R}^3\)
  • Familiarity with differentiation with respect to arc length
  • Knowledge of the inverse function theorem
  • Basic concepts of vector calculus, particularly dot products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of regular parametrized curves in \(\mathbb{R}^3\)
  • Learn about the inverse function theorem and its applications in calculus
  • Explore vector calculus, focusing on differentiation of vector functions
  • Investigate the implications of unit vector fields in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying differential geometry, physics students dealing with motion in three-dimensional space, and educators looking for examples of parametrization and differentiation techniques.

noospace
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [itex]\alpha : I \to \mathbb{R}^3[/itex] be a regular parametrized curve and let [itex]\beta : J \to \mathbb{R}^3[/itex] be a reparametrization in terms of arc length [itex]s = s(t)[/itex].

Show that [itex]\frac{d^2t}{ds^2} = -\frac{\dot{\alpha} \cdot \ddot{\alpha}}{\abs{\alpha}^4}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm going to use dots and dashes to represent differentiation wrt time and arc-length, respectively.

[itex]\beta'(s) = [\alpha (t(s))]' = \dot{\alpha} t'[/itex]
[itex]\beta''(s) = \dot{\alpha}t'' + \ddot{\alpha} t'^2[/itex] (*)

[itex]t'(s) = 1/\dot{s}(t)[/itex] by the inverse function theorem for 1 variable so
[itex]\dot{\alpha} = \dot{s} \beta'(s)[/itex]. This is where things start to get messy.

I think I need to use the fact that [itex]\dot{\alpha} = \alpha'[/itex]. Then the result follows by dotting both sides of (*) by [itex]\alpha'[/itex].

Can you convince me that [itex]\dot{\alpha} = \alpha'[/itex]?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured this out nearly as soon as I posted it. Here it is for future use:

[itex]\beta'(s) = \dot{\alpha} t'[/itex] (1)
[itex]\beta''(s) = \dot{\alpha} t'' + \ddot{\alpha} t'^2[/itex]
[itex]\beta''(s) = \dot{\alpha} t'' + \ddot{\alpha} t'[/itex].

Applying inverse function to (1) gives [itex]\beta'(s)\dot{s} = \dot{\alpha}[/itex] showing that [itex]\dot{\alpha}[/itex] is parallel to [itex]\beta'[/itex].

But [itex]\beta'[/itex] is a unit vector field so [itex]\beta'\cdot\beta''=0 \implies \dot{\alpha} \cdot \beta''=0[/itex]. Hence

[itex]0 = \dot{\alpha}^2 t'' + \dot{\alpha}\cdot\ddot{\alpha} t'^2[/itex]
[itex]t'' = - \frac{\dot{\alpha}\cdot \ddot{\alpha}t'^2}{\dot{\alpha}^2} = -\frac{\dot{\alpha}\cdot\ddot{\alpha}}{\dot{\alpha}^4}[/itex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K