Space L Infinity Homework: Open or Closed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Space
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a space in the context of l-infinity, specifically whether a given set A is open or closed. Participants are examining the definitions and implications of convergence within this space.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of open sets in l-infinity and question the implications of choosing different sequences and limits. There are discussions about the nature of convergence and the necessity of considering all convergent sequences.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to clarify the nature of sequences and their limits, but no consensus has been reached on the status of set A.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of sequences in l-infinity, particularly focusing on the definitions of open and closed sets, and the implications of limits that may or may not lie within the set A.

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/121/77689018gc3.png

Homework Equations


A space is open iff there is for each x in A a ball (fully) contained within A.

The Attempt at a Solution


If I consider A in [tex]l^{\infty }[/tex] then the sup =1. So for each x there is ball with a radius smaller than 1 contained within A.

Is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you pick an x such that lim x_n as n->infinity=1. Then what do you use as epsilon? BTW, what is K?
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
Suppose you pick an x such that lim x_n as n->infinity=1. Then what do you use as epsilon? BTW, what is K?

K is C (complex number) or R(real number). So in the sequence you chose I would take for the radius of the ball [tex]1-x_n[/tex] since this is the distance between the limit and the sequence. Is this correct Dick?
 
You can't pick a different epsilon for every n. Look at the definition of l_infinity. |x-y|<epsilon means for all n, |xn-yn|<epsilon.
 
But if that's the case then I cannot find a epsilon so then A cannot be open, right?
 
dirk_mec1 said:
But if that's the case then I cannot find a epsilon so then A cannot be open, right?

I think that's correct.
 
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3591/42927439wp4.png

So I take the sequence: [tex]x_n = \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{n}[/tex] This converges with limit 1/2 but we know that [tex]|x_n|<1[/tex] so then both the sequence and the limit are in A. But then A is closed.

Is this a correct proof: can I just take a convergent sequence?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, you can't take just any convergent sequence. You have to consider ALL converent sequences. And you can't say anything about just one sequence either. Remember a point in A is itself a sequence. A sequence in A is a sequence of sequences.
 
A cannot be closed because the sequence that you mentioned is in A but has a limit outside A, right Dick?
 
  • #10
The 'sequence' I mentioned isn't a sequence in A. It's a point in A. Can you construct a sequence in A that converges to a point that's not in A.
 
  • #11
I define the sequence [tex]x_{nj}[/tex] , j=1,2... (a sequence of sequences). Each of the [tex]x_{nj}[/tex] has the following properties:

1) [tex]|x_{nj}|<1[/tex]
2) [tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |x_{nj}| = 1[/tex]

but the limit is not in A therefore A cannot be closed. Is it okay now, Dick?
 
  • #12
Almost. If n in the index within sequence number j, the limit n->infinity=1 is not enough. The limiting sequence could still be in A. You want the limit as j->infinity=1. It might be clearer if you actually give an example. Like a_nj=(1-1/j). So sequence number j is just the constant sequence (1-1/j,1-1/j,...). The limiting sequence is (1,1,1,...) which is NOT in A. Try writing down the sequences explicitly like this to make sure you are saying what you mean.
 
  • #13
Dick said:
Almost. If n in the index within sequence number j, the limit n->infinity=1 is not enough. The limiting sequence could still be in A. You want the limit as j->infinity=1.
So I made the mistake of the fact that for each j the sequence converges but what we want is that the entire sequence converges to one.

It might be clearer if you actually give an example. Like a_nj=(1-1/j). So sequence number j is just the constant sequence (1-1/j,1-1/j,...). The limiting sequence is (1,1,1,...) which is NOT in A. Try writing down the sequences explicitly like this to make sure you are saying what you mean.
So in this example [tex]a_{nj} = 1 - \frac{1}{j}[/tex] for each j the sequence is just a constant for every natural number, right?
 
  • #14
Yes, each sequence is constant. The limit of the constants is 1.
 
  • #15
Ok finally I got for the closure:

[tex]A:= \{ x: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{K} |\ \forall n \in \mathbb{N}\ |x_n| \leq 1 \}[/tex]

But how can I prove that there are accumalation points around x_n =1?
 
  • #16
If you have sequence where some of the x_i's are one, isn't it pretty straightforward to construct a sequence of sequences in A that converges to it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K