After reading over Sikz, FZ+, Eh and jammieg reply,I have been reviewing the questions from other websites and sources. Perhaps I have been leaning too much towards a Metaphysical theory or idea then a conventionual one, a thin line perhaps? interesting? yes. Reading Einstein's theory that gravity is space/time curvature and Stephen Hawking's thoughts on the nature of space/time, I was motivated to look into this line of thought much further to see if it was possible to flush out conceptions that are and were ignored as being too radical and not having proofs. I for one would not throw away in my mind the theories of General Relativity merely for some unproven theory. Thus I arrived upon the idea of making a mental model, "Conceptional Cosmolgy" and begin with Space/Matter leaving out "Time" and "Velocity" in order to bite into raw material, later evolving or progressing towards Space/Time/Velocity but it was to be a step by step process building an engine by first constructing the block and progressing towards a unified power plant. The construction for a "Conceptional Cosmology" model has begun,but there lies some questions first. What are your thoughts on: A: Space/Matter as a unified Continuum? B: Matter as the primary state? C: Space as the secondary state? If yes to the above three questions what would the next most important addition be? if no on anyone of the above,why? D: Your Comment. Thank you for your help.